復興航空空難其實是制度殺人？

他們被制度謀殺了，機組只是不自覺的工具人而已，我們要探究的是，如何揪出元凶

作者 / forexkan

首先，我必須說很高興終於有司法單位主動介入，調查民航這塊爛瘡疤，但是因為國家考試不考民航法規，而民航法牽涉到很多技術性的概念，純粹由普通刑法來評價確實有些難度。這些民航從業人員違法犯紀，其危害程度不亞於頂新集團的造假；頂新集團是針對全民全面性慢性投毒，航空公司為了績效而違法造假的行為，不啻如針對全民隨機埋入的定時炸彈。

（參考新聞：四秒關引擎 資深機師質疑違反程序）

航空公司機務部門為了圖利公司討好長官，粉飾自己績效，不按規定執行檢修程序，卻在業務文書上登載不實，歷年來就算被民航局查獲，民航也只是行政罰鍰，從來沒有移送，這些被查獲的都是民航局事後稽核查出來的，只是冰山的一角，還有更多等著引爆下一次空難。

飛安會召開記者會公布飛航紀錄器初步解讀。 圖片來源：聯合新聞網

正如此次復興空難，顯然機組在第一個發動機失效後，執行程序時關錯發動機，為何一個訓練有素的機長會犯下如此重大且明顯的錯誤？這應該可以證實在他起飛前一定有某些因素困擾他，這印證媒體登載，有人爆料機長提及在前一段航行中發動機異常，機務要他這趟飛回來再修；這種事對機長來說往往造成很大壓力，明知不可為而為之，但若不為，後果也可能造成他個人遭公司秋後算帳，所以可以推導帶著這種預先知道發動機異常的忐忑情境跟壓力，在飛機一起飛時竟然真的發生發動機失效情事，錯愕、慌亂可見一斑。

這可以由機長向塔台發出Mayday求救，是在兩個發動機都失效才發出的就可以證實，因為全世界的機師所受的訓練從入門第一課到退休，是每半年必考科目，而單發失效原則程序都是1.先穩住飛機、2.保持航向、3.上高度避地障，接著呼救，再來才是執行將故障發動機關油門、關電門；因此先前發動機異常的先佔情境，應該是造成他錯愕慌亂的主因，進而導致關錯發動機，而且可能三名駕駛都同樣陷於因為先前發動機異常，機務又不願檢修的陰影，這都必須揉入人性因素(Human Factor, 我不認同用人為因素，ICAO手冊的解釋就是人性)考量，才能最終判斷當時的情境。

事後批評人家時，要設身處地(put yourself into their shoes)，想像一下人家當時的情境，不要一開始造神造成這樣，現在又落井下石，太不堪了，固然他們害人害己不應該，但是失速警告stall stall 響了五次，可以判斷他們在最後還是在失速邊緣勉強保持高度，無論是想撐回機場或找落地點，這都是出於拯救生命的善念，他們被制度謀殺了，機組只是不自覺的工具人而已，我們要探究的是，如何揪出元凶，把這幫真正的罪魁禍首杜絕掉。我期待士檢能有所作為。

(作者擔任過國內航空公司機師，經作者授權刊登)

延伸閱讀：不該發生的空難 – 機師憶空難調查報告、復興航空空難 機師現身說法

 

235 thoughts on “復興航空空難其實是制度殺人？”

  18. Outstanding read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was performing a bit research on that. And he truly bought me lunch as I identified it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

    回覆

  29. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and adore learning a lot more on this subject. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with a lot more details? It is very beneficial for me.

    回覆

  55. your weblog is really very good. It was extremely nicely authored and effortless to understand. Unlike additional blogs I’ve read which are truly not good. I also found your posts very intriguing

    回覆

  65. I totally realize what you’ve explained. In fact, I browsed throughout your several other content material articles and I do believe you’re definitely correct. Congrats with this particular blog.

    回覆

  94. you’re in point of fact a excellent webmaster. The web internet site loading pace is incredible. It seems which you are doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you

    回覆

  114. Wow, superb weblog structure! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging glance simple. The total appear of your web internet site is excellent, neatly as the content material material!

    回覆

  116. Good read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was performing just a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

    回覆

  127. Can I say that of a relief to locate somebody that in fact knows what theyre talking about over the internet. You definitely know how to bring a challenge to light and produce it essential. The diet ought to have a look at this and recognize why side within the story. I cant believe youre not a lot more well-liked when you completely offer the gift.

    回覆

  134. I had been honored to obtain a call from a friend as he found the crucial guidelines shared on the internet site. Browsing your weblog post can be a real amazing experience. Thanks again for thinking of readers like me, and I hope for you the most effective of achievements as being a professional discipline.

    回覆

  138. After study several of the content inside your internet website now, and I actually such as your indicates of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and will also be checking back soon. Pls appear into my internet page likewise and tell me what you feel.

    回覆

  140. Numerous thanks for spending some time to write about this, I actually feel clearly about it and I really like to researching far much more about this concern. Whenever possible, would you mind updating your weblog with a whole lot far more information? It is quite beneficial for me.

    回覆

  141. Hiya! Amazing blog! I happen to be a every day visitor to your web site (somewhat far more like addict ) of this website. Just wanted to say I appreciate your blogs and am seeking forward for a lot more!

    回覆

  155. You will find quite lots of details that way to consider. That is actually a great examine bring up. I supply thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly you’ll be able to locate questions just like the 1 you retrieve the spot that the most significant factor will likely be in the honest excellent faith. I don?t know if guidelines have emerged about issues like that, but Almost surely that your chosen job is clearly labeled as a reasonable game. Both youngsters notice the impact of just a little moment

    回覆

  184. Immediately a bit of guests will continue across hotel rooms and obtain tied bus excursions, nonetheless, a lot of with all the fancy car applications provide your personal tour specialist. That just may assist you browse via the neighborhood effectively you could an individual

    回覆

  188. Aw, it was a really great post. In notion I would like to devote writing such as this furthermore,??iC spending time and specific work to produce a great write-up?- nonetheless so what can I say?- I waste time alot and never at all seem to obtain one thing completed.

    回覆

  197. I am typically to blogging and i genuinely appreciate your posts. The content material has truly peaks my interest. Let me bookmark your web internet site and sustain checking for brand spanking new info.

    回覆

  204. I’m really loving the theme/design of your web internet site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility troubles? A couple of of my weblog readers have complained about my website not working properly in Explorer but looks excellent in Chrome. Do you’ve got any ideas to assist fix this concern?

    回覆

  209. Currently actually do not stop eating because there is however the decision which you will transform into. Function from your home us rrs often a fad for that who wants to earn dollars but nonetheless enough time requires most substantial occasions making use of children and kids goes for as the modern habit. attract abundance

    回覆

  215. You truly make it seem so easy together with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I believe I would never comprehend. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it! xrumer

    回覆

  217. Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my cousin were just preparing to do some research on this. We grabbed a book from our region library but I think I learned a lot more from this post. I’m really glad to see such fantastic info being shared freely out there

    回覆

  220. Very good – I need to certainly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating by way of all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I lately found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for people who add forums or something, internet website theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Superb task.

    回覆

  226. I precisely desired to say thanks once again. I am not sure what I could possibly have tried in the absence of those suggestions contributed by you relating to such a subject. It had become a distressing condition in my view, even so , being able to view the well-written tactic you processed it produced me to weep over joy. Incredibly grateful for your guidance and believe you realize what an amazing job you

    回覆

  231. 1. 管理階層 有2種 a. 淘空公司 b. 賺錢給老闆看
    搞飛機
    2. 飛行員 a. 搞飛機 找新老闆投資買飛機 b. 搞空姐 c. 搞有錢女人
    3. 機務 a. 一照闖天下英文都看懂了嗎b .搞飛機
    4.空姐 嗨 別説了

    回覆

  232. 三位資深機師同時關錯的機率有多小? 被"已知的"突發狀況嚇? 他們可都是飛行數千小時的老鳥，不是菜鳥。無人反對四秒關機，是早有原因?
    二號機故障時高度是否已經很低? 一號機是否完全正常如"飛航專家"說返回機場? (只有一條跑道不是嗎?)根本就"飛回要檢修"了! 一直重開車是因為? 一架飛機的事故，絕對不會只有一兩個人的問題，是一整個機隊，甚至一整個公司的錯失。
    在空中要是系統不可靠，身負重任的機師不會把乘客的命拿來賭啊! 降速找地方安全迫降是不是三位機師最確定，傷害最小的選擇?
    往者英靈不遠，檢討時說話可否尊敬一點?

    回覆

    1. 這篇文章我不覺得有貶低他們的意思

      而對他們最尊敬的做法
      就是確確實實、老老實實的把每一項細節錯誤通通檢討出來
      而不是只會把尊重掛在嘴邊
      否則他們不是白死了?
      如果不肯真實的面對承認錯誤
      類似的事件永遠還是會發生

      另外我也可以告訴你…
      古往今來所有的災難事件…
      扣掉天然災害
      人為因素都遠大於機械因素!!!

      回覆

      1. 告訴我告訴我，你拿什麼告訴我？連個名字都不放你空口白話要說什麼？

        你哪來的信心人為因素都遠大於機械因素!!!？？？更何況你怎麼分人為和機械？
        下雨了害你摔車是人為還是機械？當然是人為，誰叫你下雨還不小心騎。
        修車師傅沒把你的輪子鎖緊害你龍頭抖動摔車是人為還是機械？
        當然是人為，因為師傅沒作好呀。
        原廠叫你用一瓶500元的機油你偏偏用480的而且還不回原廠保養是人為還是機械？
        當然是人為，誰叫你不回原廠。
        你車子買回家半天前懸吊就斷了是人為還是機械？
        當然是人為，要嘛就品管不嚴要嘛就設計不良。

        哪一個機械不是人為的？除了天災都是人禍，哪有什麼機械、人為。

        回覆

對 Thelma Roggero 發表迴響 取消回覆

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *

你可以使用這些 HTML 標籤與屬性： <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Related Posts

Recent Posts

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略，不是貿易！

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案：缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病：儲物症（Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一