社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

The Mask Is Finally Coming Off: The Ugly Truth of China 

  • English Article
  • 國際

As people in the Australian intelligence community (and many citizens) are starting to wonder: What exactly is the price of a nation’s sovereignty? It’s a question all citizens of the free world should be asking.

The unrest in Hong Kong has been getting a lot of attention recently – and for good reason – but it’s just one example of China’s inflexible and anti-democratic approach to world affairs. It seems like it would be a relatively no-brainer for Carrie Lam’s government to offer some – any –  kind of concession to end months and months of protests in Hong Kong (not to mention the effect the protests had on recent elections, where Lam’s party lost big) and all the violence and police controversies they entail, but – no doubt under Beijing’s guidance – she refuses to give an inch. Not only is this stance somewhat irrational, but it aptly represents the CCP’s attitude towards just about every issue on Earth – “My way or the highway” – no matter what the vast majority of people think. And as folks from all quarters of the globe are slowly waking up to realize, China’s “way” is not a very pleasant one, given that its main objectives are to maximize and consolidate its power and wealth by any means necessary. Notice, I didn’t say by any legitimate means necessary, and certainly not by any ethical means necessary (although that could probably be said about most world powers).

Australia recognizes the threats from China. Image source: Reuters
Australia recognizes the threats from China. Image source: Reuters

There is an abiding principle here that most people not exposed to these kinds of autocratic regimes may fail to grasp (and it could be applied to any dictatorial-type government, including in places like Cuba, Venezuela, etc.), which is that what these governments say versus what they do are two vastly different (and sometimes diametrically opposed) things. Granted, democratic governments also spin facts and figures to their advantage, but the difference here is that China (or North Korea, or whatever) spews forth outright lies on the world stage – and by that I mean statements that have nary a grain of truth – to create the image (and it’s never anything more than that) that they operate in rational, accountable, rule-of-law sort of manner. However, because no one in their own land is able to call them out for their mistruths (without ending up in jail, that is), if foreign observers aren’t careful and take their words at face-value (as they’re no doubt accustomed to with more freely elected governments), they’ll be taken for a ride, hook, line and sinker, without necessarily realizing they’ve been duped (check out Sean Penn’s attitude towards Hugo Chavez, for example).

The only problem these propaganda-machine governments encounter (thankfully), is the fact that actions do actually speak louder than words. So no matter what they say, and how well they deceive the sometimes-gullible public, they can never avoid the bald-faced truth of what they’ve been doing. The challenge, therefore, for those on the outside of these nearly impenetrable block-box regimes, is to penetrate the subterfuge of what’s they’re saying (lying about) to arrive at the reality of what’s happening. And a good illustration of this phenomenon is China’s recent underhanded activities in Australia.

One case involves an Australian businessman, Nick Zhao, who told intelligence agents there he’d been recruited to win a seat in parliament as a Chinese agent, claiming his election campaign would be financed by another local businessman with ties to the CCP. The end of this twisted tale? Mr. Zhao was found dead inside a hotel room, something the local authorities are still investigating.

Another case is that of Australian asylum seeker Wang Liqiang, who said he’d previously acted as an undercover Chinese operative, assisting a businessman in Hong Kong to run clandestine spying and disinformation operations in Hong Kong and Taiwan aimed at undermining democracy in those places. Wang also dished on details of the now-infamous kidnapping of anti-Chinese book publishers in Hong Kong, spying on pro-democracy university students in that city, and stealing US military technology. (Wang came to Australia for asylum because his wife and child currently live there).

There’s also the peculiar case of Gladys Liu, a newly elected member of Australia’s Parliament, who gave mixed signals about her allegiance when questioned on such topics as China’s aggressive actions in the South China Sea and the Hong Kong protests, almost as if she were worried about offending Beijing (and this an elected member of Australia’s government!).

What more, pro-democracy protests at Australian universities by Hong Kong students have been routinely interrupted – sometimes with violence – by mainland Chinese students, while multiple protestors say they’ve been followed or had their picture taken by people possibly associated with Australia’s Chinese consulate. In fact, even an Australian journalist, John Garnaut, who once wrote a classified report on Chinese interference in the country, has reported being trailed by potential Chinese agents – including when he was out and about with his family.

Of course, as is commonplace with these sorts of regimes – as noted above – their primary ‘strategy’ when being accused of blatantly illegal activities is to strenuously deny that they even occurred, essentially pulling the wool over the eyes of the entire world. Which exactly is why China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman in Australia has labeled the above accusations “hysteria,” and said “stories like ‘Chinese espionage’ or ‘China’s infiltration in Australia,’ with however bizarre plots and eye-catching details, are nothing but lies.” And if that’s not a case of the pot calling the kettle black, I don’t know what is! Or perhaps they’ve simply taken a page out of Hilter’s playbook, as he once famously stated that the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it as they can’t imagine anyone having “the impudence to distort the truth so infamously” ….

One former Australian intelligence official has labeled China’s espionage efforts in the country “insidious,” and I couldn’t come up with a better word to describe them myself. I mean, these cases are reminiscent of something straight out of 1984 – an autocratic government openly (and sloppily) spying on dissenters of its agenda, while at the same time trying to plant agents at the highest level of government!? How can this situation possibly be tolerated by the Australian authorities?

The reason, sadly, is that they (or at least, some high-profile companies associated with the Aussie government) have been getting filthy rich through trade with China, making them less willing to crack down on the often disturbing behavior of China’s state-sponsored actors. But as people in the Australian intelligence community (and many citizens) are starting to wonder: What exactly is the price of a nation’s sovereignty? It’s a question all citizens of the free world should be asking.

Author / Javier Smith

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

Australia China HongKong
2019-12-21 Javier Smith

Post navigation

執行「反斬首任務」不分黨派 → ← 挺民主的反射動作

Related Posts

拒絕戒嚴思想復甦,捍衛台灣民主底線

國民黨在今天處理得死刑公投,又即將在下周處理其所提出的反戒嚴公投,但這完全是荒謬的歷史顛倒,更違反憲政原則。依據《中華民國憲法》第62條,立法院職責是立法、審查預算、監督政府,而非政黨謀求自身權力利益的平台。特別是反戒嚴的公投,涉及總統職權,卻被藍白操作成政黨失去總統大位後,用來擴權的工具,這嚴重違反權力分立原則。至於戒嚴,真正的祖師爺是中國國民黨,卻從未見該黨真心認錯懺悔。 首先,曾經實施戒嚴的是中國國民黨,而民主進步黨從成立之初便致力於爭取解除戒嚴,如今卻由當年實施戒嚴的政黨,主導反戒嚴公投,這不僅顛倒歷史,更是對台灣民主運動歷史的侮辱。試想,一個曾經實施戒嚴、壓迫人民自由的政黨,如今自稱要保障人民不再經歷戒嚴,這種言論與作為,如何能取信於民? 再者,國民黨在公投提案中聲稱希望台灣青年不要因戰爭而家毀人亡,但歷史事實卻顯示,過去真正使台灣人民家毀人亡的正是國民黨自己。從1947年開始,國民黨長期以戒嚴狀態濫捕濫殺,造成許多青年無辜犧牲。今天竟然由國民黨來提出「反戒嚴」,猶如兇手自稱要替受害者主持正義,這無疑是對歷史的諷刺與羞辱。 此外,國民黨今日聲稱反戰反戒嚴,事實上,歷史上的戰爭和暴力事件多數由國民黨所主導。1953年國民黨發動的東山島海戰,國軍死亡831人,皆是在國民黨撤退來台後發動;1987年七三慘案,手無寸鐵的難民遭國民黨政府屠殺,當時執政者蔣經國,甚至未對肇事者做任何懲處。這樣一個歷史包袱沉重的政黨,從未向台灣人民誠懇道歉,更從不承認自己就是暴行兇手,寧願選擇遺忘。如今,卻宣稱要避免戰爭與戒嚴,這樣的說辭,令人難以接受。 更令人擔憂的是,國民黨透過烏克蘭戰爭事件,試圖將其反戒嚴訴求與國際情勢混淆,卻忽略了烏俄戰爭的真正本質:俄羅斯的軍事侵略,伴隨思想改造、語言消滅及民族壓迫。回顧歷史,國民黨在台灣實施的正是此種統治方式,包括禁止台灣人說台灣話、推動思想控制,這些歷史的罪行,至今尚未獲得充分的道歉與懺悔。 事實上,若戰爭真的發生,受到傷害的不只是青年,而是整個國家與所有人民,包括現在協助中國進行政治宣傳的人士也將無法倖免。國民黨甚至在公投主文中出現嚴重錯誤,凸顯出其對自身歷史的心虛與不敢面對,這也正是造成國會紛亂與民主品質下降的原因之一。 最後,必須嚴肅提醒各位,台灣曾遭受長達38年的戒嚴統治,是全世界最長的軍事戒嚴。而這是國民黨為政黨利益而施加的暴政,造成許多民主前輩不惜生命與青春抗爭,才終於換來今日的民主自由。民進黨堅持捍衛民主自由,絕不會允許戒嚴思想再次復甦。我們今日的反戒嚴,不僅僅是一句口號,更是以行動堅決防止歷史重演,確保台灣民主永不倒退。 作者:慎之

如何破解2個中國政權的對台主權謊言?

2025年適逢二次大戰終戰80週年,面對戰後至今的國際秩序,川普總統執政下的美國意欲調整它,而中俄等挑戰者更是懷抱將它推倒、以自身意志取而代之的念頭,因此使相關歷史的詮釋主導權,成為各方無硝煙的戰場,這其中也包含「如何界定台灣戰後主權態樣」的大哉問,又以中國對其挑戰為最力。 與「二戰後的台灣主權態樣」有關的問題,其爭點集中在以下2個方面: —如何判斷開羅宣言以降、直到舊金山和約與其附約為止,一系列與台灣主權地位有關的國際法法律文件的效力? —聯合國大會1971年2758號決議,除了處理2個中國政府在聯合國的代表權問題以外,有涉及到台澎主權的歸屬嗎? 關於這2個問題,目前系涉各方的立場如下: —美國為首、並有捷荷等國參與的西方多國,透過立法權及行政權多管齊下,目前將重點著力於否認2758號決議之涉及台澎主權歸屬,舊金山和約則作為其較未特別強調的背景性因素。 —中國為首、並有俄羅斯與其附庸附和的一派,則基於其所謂反法西斯、反納粹的基調,宣稱「僅憑開羅 宣言及波茨坦公告,即可證明中國已擁有台澎主權,而舊金山和約沒有中國與蘇聯參與、對中俄無效;至於2758號決議,則是中國對台灣領有主權的再度確認」。 —而「中華民國在台灣」的立場,為維持其自認的領台正當性,其投機主義心向與中俄不相軒輊,一方面在各份國際法法律文件的判定上,特別是開羅宣言到波茨坦公告的部份,抱持與中俄相同的立場,但與中俄不同的是強調日華台北和約,在確定中華民國領有台灣主權中的重要性;不過在2758號決議方面則與美國為首的西方世界同調、否認該決議之涉及台澎主權歸屬。 先不論美國為首的西方世界,目前還沒有打算從「舊金山和約第2條(b)項,僅規定日本放棄台澎主權、而未規定其繼受國的方向」切入,處理台澎建國課題的情況,中俄一派與「中華民國在台灣」,依靠其自認為有利的國際法文件,各自宣稱據有台澎主權的情況,對台灣人而言,則是不折不扣的謬論與謊言,因為: —就國際法文件的效力判斷而言,開羅宣言是峰會會後新聞公報、波茨坦公告與日本對盟軍降書只是意向表示,戰敗國外地領土的處分,終究還是要以作為終戰和約的舊金山和約為準,俄羅斯前身的蘇聯不予簽字、以及中國代表權的問題,都不會影響和約的終局處分效力。 —觀2758號決議,無論是聯合國官方英文、抑或中文文本,都只確定中華人民共和國之作為聯合國大會及安理會會員國、以及將蔣介石政權代表從聯合國與其附屬機構驅逐出去的事案,根本無涉於台澎主權所屬。 面對過去蔡政府對台灣主權與國家定位議題的模糊處理,以及循二戰終戰80週年再起、與台灣主權有關的各種謊言,台灣人有必要走出過去幾年中華民國在台灣製造的迷霧,依據國際法的論理與知識,維護台灣人循住民自決啟動建國程序的正當權力。 作者:江夏生

永續共存(跟上台中興農高爾夫球場4/30停止營運,移交給台積電設廠時事)

近期台中科學園區旁的興農高爾夫球場確定停止營運,將移交給台積電建晶圓廠,引起部分球場會員抗議,也有民眾擔心破壞野生生物的棲息空間。這件事讓我想起,新北板橋的台北遠東通訊園區開發過程。 以前那裡是遠東紡織板橋廠及遠東高爾夫球場,聽從事業務工作的父親提到,他曾陪客戶到球場邊打球邊談生意,每張球證只要新台幣四百元。 球場球道總計九洞,要全程打完18洞賽程就得打兩輪,不同球道中間有種一排高大的樹木隔開,在熱鬧的板橋市區中,是難得的大片綠地,尤其颱風帶來大雨時,球場草地可當作臨時蓄洪區,減緩淹水災害。 隨著產業轉型及城市發展,原本的紡織廠及球場停止營運,業者開發成台北遠東通訊園區,建很多棟現代化的商辦大樓,吸引知名跨國企業總部及連鎖餐廳進駐,提供大量工作機會變身新興商業區。同時業者也捐地給官方,建消防隊大樓及圖書館總館,改善當地生活機能。 好在業者開發時,保留球場的部分樹木並設置生態池,開發為公園及廣場,吸引多種本土鳥類棲息,也成為板橋居民的休閒好去處,同時保留紡織廠煙囪及部分廠房,見證台灣工商發展歷史。 既然城市要發展得進行土地開發,但過程要如何兼顧經濟、環境保護、社會人文景觀、民眾居住權益,是個好問題。台北遠東通訊園區開發過程或許可供其他土地開發案參考,讓開發不等於破壞,而是兼顧記憶及永續的轉型。 作者:張居隱

「重層嚇阻、防衛固守」下的海馬斯火箭彈系統

現代戰爭中,聯合作戰已是常態,日前軍方於九鵬基地成功試射新購的「海馬斯火箭彈」,代表陸軍在跨區增援的能力上大幅躍進,從三軍的角度而言,海馬斯火箭彈系統將有助於聯合作戰的效能與威力。 根據「洛克希德馬丁」公司官方所透露的消息來論,我國採購的彈種為M30、M31火箭彈,射程約70-92公里;若是換成一枚MGM-140戰術彈道飛彈,射程可達305公里,理論上從台灣本島向西射擊,將有助於破壞解放軍位於福建沿海的海空基地、防空陣地、雷達站等,大幅增進陸軍遠程火力打擊的能力。 海馬斯多管火箭彈的服役,目前部署在中部地區的58砲指部,隸屬於陸軍第十軍團,為中部地區最為重要的地面部隊,在中部地區三軍聯合作戰的層面,海馬斯火箭彈因具有射程上的優勢,故擔負遠程打擊的能力。國造、射程較短的雷霆兩千火箭彈,擔負距離45公里的防衛,兩者雖然射程差異甚大,但卻能在聯合作戰中達到「互補」之功效,也能為海、空軍分攤防衛壓力。 從聯合作戰的角度來說,海馬斯火箭彈系統已全面提升陸軍的與遠程打擊能力;在俄烏戰爭中(2022年至今),烏克蘭陸軍透過該系統,屢次針對境內俄軍或俄國本土給予打擊,數度拖延俄軍部隊的集結、前進速度,在想定的台澎防衛作戰中,陸軍自2020確定向美方採購海馬斯系統後,實際上也代表美方對於台灣採購遠距打擊的裝備給予一定程度的鬆綁,此一舉措不但是要因應當前緊張的印太局勢,國軍面對解放軍的威脅與壓迫時,海馬斯系統也為軍方提供一定程度的防衛優勢。 面對敵情威脅,以及川普2.0的不確定性因素,在國防建軍的路途上,務實面對威脅、採購必要裝備、持續嚴格訓練為國家安全的不二法門,由於海馬斯火箭彈已接受過戰場的嚴苛考驗,對於全球的用戶而言將提供一個相當優良的素材以供參考。 作者:宋磊

Recent Posts

拒絕戒嚴思想復甦,捍衛台灣民主底線

拒絕戒嚴思想復甦,捍衛台灣民主底線

國民黨在今天處理得死刑公投,又即將在下周處理其所提出的反戒嚴公投,但這完全是荒謬的歷史顛倒,更違反憲政原則。依據《中華民國憲法》第62條,立法院職責是立法、審查預算、監督政府,而非政黨謀求自身權力利益的平台。特別是反戒嚴的公投,涉及總統職權,卻被藍白操作成政黨失去總統大位後,用來擴權的工具,這嚴重違反權力分立原則。至於戒嚴,真正的祖師爺是中國國民黨,卻從未見該黨真心認錯懺悔。 [...]

More Info
國民黨發「小確幸」反罷免真能奏效?

國民黨發「小確幸」反罷免真能奏效?

大罷免運動即將進入最終章,將有多達30席國民黨立委面臨第三階段投票,可能是另類版的期中選舉,若國民黨團要在這次改選維持優勢,必須要確定補選不能被拿走6席立委,確保有八成勝率才能過關。而為了度過難關,立院國民黨團選擇放假、普發現金、勤跑基層力求度過難關,究竟能不能奏效呢? [...]

More Info
邊緣人們:改變台灣的推進器,會是林沛祥們意想不到的巨浪!

邊緣人們:改變台灣的推進器,會是林沛祥們意想不到的巨浪!

大罷免剩下最後一席,基隆成為最後35區,火力相挺的地方。原因不只是,因為基隆是最後一個截止的立委選區,更大的原因是,林沛祥們的添加柴火,使得邊緣人們,都站出來了! 林沛祥的發言,很難想像中國國民黨在沒有大罷免,或是大罷免失敗下,還會做出什麼喪心病狂的事情。連連署的民眾都是邊緣人,也說得出口,代表他就是藐視民意。這樣的民意代表,罷掉只是剛剛好而已。 [...]

More Info
民眾黨快來收割國民黨的「青蔥」!

民眾黨快來收割國民黨的「青蔥」!

民眾黨有個千載難逢的機會,可以收割國民黨的「青蔥」。這可不是說民眾黨居心叵測,在國民黨背後開鎗。怪都要怪國民黨把他們的「青年團」好說歹說的勸誘,甚麼時代考驗青年,青年創造時代,黨旗仍然飛揚,這是革命的黃埔! [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way