社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

WHO – better health for everyone everywhere except Taiwan

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意
  • 評論

Surely the existential threat posed by disease is sufficient reason to include Taiwan in the WHA. A change in mindset is needed to make the WHO into the inclusive organization it claims to be.

The World Health Assembly (WHA), the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO), meets 20–28 May in Geneva. Although the WHO promises “better health for everyone, everywhere,” the organization systematically excludes one country from the annual discussions. Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China (ROC), has one of the world’s best medical systems and can make important scientific contributions. Yet, Taiwan is not permitted to send a delegation to WHA meetings, even with observer status, to share knowledge about urgent health threats.

WHO needs Taiwan. Photo source: CivilMedia.tw
WHO needs Taiwan. Photo source: CivilMedia.tw

This situation, like that at all United Nations (UN) venues, is a relic of the Cold War when two governments disputed which could legitimately represent China. Of course, only the People’s Republic of China (PRC) can represent the 1.386 billion people living within its jurisdiction. But what about the 23 million people who live on independently ruled Taiwan, with its Ministry of Health and Welfare entirely under Taiwanese control? What about the entire ecology of microorganisms that spread disease across borders with no regard for political disputes?

The Challenge of Preventing Pandemics

Since viruses know no boundaries and do not discriminate between citizenries, the exclusion of Taiwan is an important gap in the global health system. Taiwan learned this lesson quite painfully in 2003 when an epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) took 181 lives (27%) out of 668 confirmed cases.

In retrospect, public health experts understood that one obstacle was that Taiwan is not part of the WHO and thus could not access needed epidemiological data and virus samples in a timely fashion. Taiwanese medical professionals, excluded from face-to-face WHO meetings, had to rely on the WHO website and ask other countries (especially the USA) to share data. From 2009 to 2016, Taiwan was permitted to attend the WHA as an observer under the name Chinese Taipei. Since 2017, however, China has taken a hardline stance against Taiwan and blocked its participation.

Nowadays, the greatest threats seem to be zoonotic influenza viruses — viruses that first infect animals and then spread into human populations. Avian influenza, which affects poultry but could potentially mutate and infect humans, has appeared in two strains in Taiwan since 2003. In 2019, the main concerns are Hog cholera and African swine fever. Taiwan takes all possible measures to avoid a pandemic outbreak, including using automated sensors to test incoming air passengers for fevers and strictly enforcing laws on illegally importing meat. To be fully successful, such efforts need the international co-operation that only the WHO can provide.

Democratic Allies Support Taiwan

Political leaders from democratic countries are beginning to express concern about this situation and show support for Taiwanese participation. In 2018, the European Parliament passed a resolution saying that the exclusion of Taiwan from the WHO is not in line with EU interests. On 9 April this year, when questioned by the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade about Taiwan’s participation in the WHA, Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland replied that Canada supports Taiwan’s “participation in international multilateral fora where its presence provides important contributions to the global public good.”

Diplomats tasked with maintaining good relations with China, while supporting Taiwan’s bids for international space, make diplomatic somersaults to plead their case. In his remarks at the 40thanniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act, for example, US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State W. Patrick Murphy reiterated the long-standing American policy:

“The United States will continue to support Taiwan’s membership in international organizations where statehood is not a requirement for membership, and its meaningful participation in international organizations where statehood is a requirement

Statehood is the Issue

Pretending that there is no independent state on Taiwan overlooks the facts that Taiwan possesses a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. In fact, having all of these characteristics make it a state according to the definition of the 1933 Montevideo Convention.

Technically, Taiwan is not a state, but the ROC is. Taiwan as a society is still debating whether they should maintain the ROC, a constitutional framework that might one day enable the emergence of a larger democratic China. Beijing is impatient with Taiwan’s boisterous democracy, which means that no elected government has moved too quickly toward either independence or unification for fear of alienating voters and losing power. China thus tries to coerce Taiwan through external means, such as vetoing Taiwan’s attempts to enter the WHA.

The refusal of the WHA and other international bodies to recognize ROC statehood has two important consequences. The first is in Taiwan itself. As China succeeds in constraining Taiwan’s international space, Taiwanese people lose confidence in their government to represent them to the world. This destabilizes Taiwan’s hard-won democracy. The second consequence is that diplomats and political leaders learn to perceive Taiwan only in its relationship with China rather than as an independent sociopolitical reality.

Denying the existence of a state on Taiwan begs the question of what Taiwan actually is. Obviously, it is not a non-governmental organization like the Red Cross, which has observer status. Taiwan’s contested status in the international arena more closely resembles Palestine, which has held observer status in the WHA since 1974 and in the UN since 2012, but which is excluded from other international entities due to American opposition. Both Taiwan and Palestine are limited in their international aspirations due to great power politics, but only Palestine gains a seat at the table at the WHA. Taiwan should be no different in terms of prioritizing human health over politics.

Taiwan is already a part of several other international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. These provide sufficient precedents for pragmatically including both the PRC and the ROC. Surely the existential threat posed by disease is sufficient reason to include Taiwan in the WHA. A change in mindset is needed to make the WHO into the inclusive organization it claims to be.

Author / Scott Simon

Scott Simon, Ph.D., is Professor in the School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, Co-holder of the Chair in Taiwan Studies, and Researcher at CIPS, University of Ottawa. Proficient in both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese, he has conducted research on various social and political issues in China, Taiwan, and Japan. He is the author of three books about Taiwan.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

Taiwan WHO 國際
2019-05-22 Scott Simon

Post navigation

看郭董「舔盤子」拚形象改造 → ← 賴清德如果想退,現在是良機

Related Posts

F-16戰機越洋返台其來有自

F-16戰機是我國空軍的主力機種,美方最早於1992年正式批准出售150架F-16A/B BLOCK 20給我國,並於1997年開始交機。當年交機的方式分為海運與從美國飛抵台灣,由於台灣和美國相隔超過一萬公里,飛行過程需經過數次空中加油、基地停靠才能完成整個飛行任務。 1997年4月開始,當時赴美受訓的F-16戰機郝光明教官接下此重責大任,郝教官在民國86年的4月4日從美國德州沃斯堡起飛,歷經11天、22小時的飛行時間、19次空中加油,期間在關島與夏威夷進行整補、休息,最終於當年4月14日返抵嘉義水上基地。 以F-16戰機的性能來說,除了在機翼下加裝兩個600加侖的副油箱,為保持飛行過程中的順暢,於起飛前先和美國攔管單位協調,過程中美國的空中加油機業也於規定時間在任務空域待命協助空中加油;F-16戰機的空中加油孔位於「機背」,在和加油機確認後開啟加油孔,加油機順勢將加油管直接深入加油孔中進行加油作業,整個過程考驗飛行員與空中加油機的默契,尤其在高難度與高風險下完成任務,也顯示出台灣赴美受訓的F-16戰機教官在美國獲得完整的訓練,當然也包括空中加油的技巧。 時隔二十多年,如今台灣向美國採購的66架F-16V BLOCK70,今年底結束前原廠應會向台灣交付10架左右,據了解空軍同樣依循當年F-16戰機飛抵國門的方式回台,全新採購的F-16V戰機也將部署於台東志航基地(第七聯隊),擔負捍衛東台灣的空防任務。 F-16戰機不但具備執行多元任務的能力,也是我空軍戰機飛官中,在各項飛行操作能力的訓練上最為完整,畢竟該款戰機本身具備多功能,赴美受訓的教官容易獲得各種科目的訓練,雖然空軍仍未獲得空中加油機,但F-16戰機飛官卻已獲得空中加油技術的學習及應用。 作者:宋磊

川普下令轟炸伊朗會引發第三次波灣戰爭嗎?

持續多日的以色列―伊朗戰爭在日前迎來新的轉折,原本對武力介入猶豫不決的美國總統川普,出乎意料的下達轟炸伊朗的命令,於21日出動多架B-2轟炸機空襲伊朗的福爾多、納坦茲與伊斯法罕(Isfahan)等核子設施,伊朗聲稱在美軍空襲前已轉移濃縮鈾等核物質,並揚言要報復,這讓外界擔心這場以色列和伊朗之間的衝突是否將升級為更大規模的區域性戰爭,也就是第三次波灣戰爭。 盡管川普總統下令出動B-2轟炸機空襲伊朗核子設施,但是並不代表他已決定對伊朗全面開戰,他也聲明不會出動地面部隊,同時催促伊朗盡快表明放棄研發核武,這讓人想起1988年4月雷根總統為反制伊朗在兩伊戰爭期間不斷襲擊波斯灣海域的油輪並挑釁美國軍艦,下令美國海軍摧毀兩座伊朗的鑽油平台,並且擊沉、重創六艘伊朗海軍艦艇的往事,這場軍事行動是有限度的,作為恫嚇伊朗不要再繼續攻擊油輪和美國軍艦,同樣的,川普總統也打算透過有限度的軍事行動對伊朗施壓,換取伊朗在核武問題的徹底讓步,然而伊朗會因此就範嗎?考量到伊朗伊斯蘭政權最高領袖哈米尼的強硬態度仍未軟化,伊朗採取武力報復是可以想見的發展。 值得警惕的是,伊朗後續採取什麼樣的回應動作是影響衝突是否會持續擴大的關鍵。 首先是伊朗會不會重施兩伊戰爭以飛彈襲擊波斯灣海域油輪、美國軍艦的故技,伊朗的飛彈庫存雖然大量消耗,但是還有數量龐大的自殺無人機可以發動攻擊,倘若發動類似攻擊,是否重演1988年美伊海戰值得觀察。 其二是伊朗除了加強攻擊以色列之外,會不會對鄰近的親美國家如沙烏地阿拉伯、阿拉伯聯合大公國等進行挑釁,同時對美國在這些國家的軍事基地、外交機構發動飛彈或無人機攻擊?這些動作是否會讓美國和沙烏地阿拉伯、阿拉伯聯合大公國等國共同武力反擊,讓衝突範圍擴大? 其三是作為伊朗伊斯蘭政權禁衛軍的革命衛隊,在中東乃至於國際仍擁有龐大的恐怖活動網絡及恐怖組織盟友,可以策動其網絡針對美國和以色列在國際的官方機構、海外僑民進行恐怖攻擊,這些恐攻會不會激怒美國加強攻擊伊朗? 前述的情境都可能刺激衝突進一步升高,甚至升級為如同1991年和2003年兩次波斯灣戰爭般的區域性戰爭。美國和伊朗是否會走向全面衝突,取決於伊朗伊斯蘭政權是否選擇擴大衝突、川普政府和以色列的戰略思考以及國際社會的外交斡旋,未來數個星期的戰局和外交交涉將會決定這場衝突的走向。 作者:洄瀾客

伊朗對美國國內的報復性「恐攻 」

美國在奇襲伊朗核武基地後,再三警告伊朗不得對美國的海外軍事基地和官方設施,進行報復性攻擊。 如果伊朗夠聰明的話,他們會陰謀在美國國內進行「恐攻」,要找幾位同情伊朗的「聖戰」烈士,駕著皮卡,衝撞人羣,傷亡屬於「治安」級,但是宣傳效果,會非常驚人!何況美國會有証據是伊朗政府主使的嗎 ? 甚至他們會慫恿「烈士」攻擊猶太人,你知道嗎?紐約市 1/3 人口是猶裔的,找尋大小目標很容易,恐攻後號稱是為巴勒斯坦人討公道,不是伊朗!你們在伊朗暗藏「默沙德」,我們不能在美國國內,發展些「聖戰組織」? 報復性「恐攻」會很快發生,這比媒體所稱伊朗會封鎖「荷姆茲海峽」的可能性大很多,因為中國所需要的 50% 海外進口石油要經此海峽,伊朗封鎖它不就是等於給「準同盟國」難題 !—— 伊朗會騷擾,封鎖未必 ! 那麼伊朗在中東的「協力者」,黎巴嫩、敍利亞、加薩走廊的哈瑪斯,都已經自身難保,唯一剩下來會有點作為的是會騷擾紅海航運的葉門。 所以,伊朗若要「報復」真要點想像力。俄國和中國等「準同盟國」,口惠而無實至。鼓動美國大學親巴勒斯坦的外籍學生以「反戰」為名抗議( 現在誰敢 ?);要民主黨左翼在國會伸出援手? 伊朗神權政府現在要努力的不是報復,或是不報復的問題,而是美國軍事介入,中東政治生態幡然隨之改變,—— 伊朗政權的權威和對內控制力是不是已經受很大的損傷 ?伊朗人民「政權更替」的雄心,會不會野火燒不畫,春風吹又生 ! 作者: 戴震

曾是台獨份子卻跑去舔共 館長根本邏輯錯亂

日前高調赴中國,自稱和平大使的網紅館長,中國經過一連串的參訪、作秀,以及被中國人洗臉之後,回到台灣,被媒體訪問關於最近的大罷免,他憤怒表示:「民進黨所作所為都是大罷免。」他表示,「自己以前是個堅定的台獨份子啊,民進黨9年,也不改國號也不改憲法。」,「氣死我了,我只能當中華民國,我現在只能當中國人啊。」 當然,修憲擺脫中華民國、中華人民共和國的框架是一個長遠的目標,而台派勢力也確實是在這條路上努力著,然而法律上、政治上也都有著巨大的障礙需要克服。但館長這類批評者們總是以「民進黨不台獨」作為理由,進行抨擊,甚至在明知中國整天對台灣文攻武嚇的狀況之下,跑去舔共、做一個統戰樣板。這樣根本荒謬至極,究竟邏輯何在? 自稱曾是台獨分子,並且也身體力行號召民眾上街反紅媒中天、反對中共對台統戰的館長,如果真要台獨,那應該是要督促民進黨實踐台獨才對吧。怎麼會因為民進黨多年來沒有成功修憲改國號,因此就轉而支持親中的政黨,甚至跑去中國吹捧敵人呢?這若不是前後反覆、邏輯錯亂,那什麼才是? 台灣位處中共極權擴張的第一線,多年來面臨其政治、軍事上的文攻武嚇,甚至還有紅色媒體的滲透等等,館長不會不知道。若館長等人要真心捍衛台灣的獨立自主,而不是為了政治鬥爭或是自身利益,那更應該團結在野和執政黨,強化台灣的自我防衛能力並加強台灣人的反共意識才對,怎麼會因為台獨尚未成功就乾脆直些跪舔中共呢?呼籲館長的粉絲以及在野黨支持者們,要看清楚這些人的邏輯漏洞,並保持捍衛台灣的中心思想。這樣才不會像這些政客或網紅一樣迷失自我。 作者:向陽之花

Recent Posts

川普下令轟炸伊朗會引發第三次波灣戰爭嗎?

川普下令轟炸伊朗會引發第三次波灣戰爭嗎?

持續多日的以色列―伊朗戰爭在日前迎來新的轉折,原本對武力介入猶豫不決的美國總統川普,出乎意料的下達轟炸伊朗的命令,於21日出動多架B-2轟炸機空襲伊朗的福爾多、納坦茲與伊斯法罕(Isfahan)等核子設施,伊朗聲稱在美軍空襲前已轉移濃縮鈾等核物質,並揚言要報復,這讓外界擔心這場以色列和伊朗之間的衝突是否將升級為更大規模的區域性戰爭,也就是第三次波灣戰爭。 [...]

More Info
F-16戰機越洋返台其來有自

F-16戰機越洋返台其來有自

F-16戰機是我國空軍的主力機種,美方最早於1992年正式批准出售150架F-16A/B BLOCK 20給我國,並於1997年開始交機。當年交機的方式分為海運與從美國飛抵台灣,由於台灣和美國相隔超過一萬公里,飛行過程需經過數次空中加油、基地停靠才能完成整個飛行任務。 [...]

More Info
伊朗對美國國內的報復性「恐攻 」

伊朗對美國國內的報復性「恐攻 」

美國在奇襲伊朗核武基地後,再三警告伊朗不得對美國的海外軍事基地和官方設施,進行報復性攻擊。 如果伊朗夠聰明的話,他們會陰謀在美國國內進行「恐攻」,要找幾位同情伊朗的「聖戰」烈士,駕著皮卡,衝撞人羣,傷亡屬於「治安」級,但是宣傳效果,會非常驚人!何況美國會有証據是伊朗政府主使的嗎 ? 甚至他們會慫恿「烈士」攻擊猶太人,你知道嗎?紐約市 1/3 [...]

More Info
曾是台獨份子卻跑去舔共 館長根本邏輯錯亂

曾是台獨份子卻跑去舔共 館長根本邏輯錯亂

日前高調赴中國,自稱和平大使的網紅館長,中國經過一連串的參訪、作秀,以及被中國人洗臉之後,回到台灣,被媒體訪問關於最近的大罷免,他憤怒表示:「民進黨所作所為都是大罷免。」他表示,「自己以前是個堅定的台獨份子啊,民進黨9年,也不改國號也不改憲法。」,「氣死我了,我只能當中華民國,我現在只能當中國人啊。」 [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way