新公民議會

社會觀察 x 獨立評論 x 多元觀點 x 公共書寫 x 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

Can Taiwan Handle a Trump-like Tycoon as President?

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意

It’s true that Gou is still an unknown political entity, and – if elected – he may end up shocking the pundits and fighting China until his last breath in the name of Taiwan’s independence.

Terry Gou, a straight-talking businessman with a mercurial temper, no political experience, a disdain for the government of his country, and a vast personal fortune at his disposal is running for president. Sound familiar?

Gou and Trump. Image source: Yahoo News
Gou and Trump. Image source: Yahoo News

Just like current US prez Donald Trump – whose successful 2016 run is said to be his inspiration for entering the political fray – Gou is one the wealthiest people in his nation, Taiwan, with his net worth estimated at US$8 billion. Putting aside the issue of where exactly Gou’s loyalties lie (his company, Foxconn, is an integral part of the economic landscape of China, employing over a million workers there, while he himself has met with the upper echelons of the CCP, including Xi Jinping), a more pertinent question is whether or not Taiwan really needs a businessman running the show.

While some voters dissatisfied with the current political situation there – like many who voted for Trump in 2016 – may jump at the chance of electing a businessman to shake up the system, if we’ve learned anything from Trump’s term in office, it’s that electing a headstrong billionaire with no experience will certainly shake things up, but not necessarily in a good way …

So far, the US mogul’s presidency has been characterized by unprecedented chaos and confusion, as Trump “has the record for White House staff turnover, for cabinet turnover and … for the highest turnover within a single department,” according to scholar Kathryn Dunn Tenpas. Pick up a newspaper on any given day, and you’re sure to read about the latest scandal or controversy unfolding in the administration. So while it may sound like a good idea to elect a political outsider to drain ‘the swap’, the reality is much more complex than that. In the case of Trump, at least, it’s seems as though his hardnosed corporate leadership style has not translated all that well into the government realm, resulting in serious instability at the top.

Additionally – if Trump’s actions are in any way indicative – a profit-first (principles-second) CEO-type leader may not always obey the ethical rules and guidelines of an advanced democracy, which exist to keep the various governing powers in balance. To mention only a few examples: Trump’s dubious firing of the Director of the FBI, James Comey, when he wasn’t happy with the direction the Russia investigation against his campaign was taking; his continual lambasting of the press when they produce stories he doesn’t like; and his administration’s blanket refusal to cooperate with the investigations of the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, whose traditional function is to provide oversight of the executive branch. Basically, the attitude of a hardcore businessman towards to the well-honed machinery of government seems to be, “It’s my way or the highway, bub,” and – regardless of which side of the political spectrum you’re on – that can’t be a good thing for democracy.

Finally, just like Trump, who refused to fully separate himself from his business operations upon assuming the presidency, it’s not clear Gou would completely distance himself from Foxconn if elected. In the words of Taiwan political expert Lev Nachman, “In the same way Trump only marginally divested from his assets when he became president, I would not expect Gou to truly move away from his [company]”. Obviously, this creates a major conflict of interest, as the person in charge may be tempted to put his own good above that of the whole. To take just one example of this from Trump’s presidency, many people wonder if there’s a simple – and disturbing – reason he didn’t take a hard line against the Saudi government after the brutal murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Could it be because, as he’s said in the past, “I get along great with all of [the Saudis]. They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.”? Essentially, if you have a wealthy tycoon in office, it may be hard for him to remove himself from his business interests, as politics and commerce are often intertwined. As Nachman says, “I would be greatly concerned with Gou’s ability to separate his business from his political endeavors. Given Foxconn’s position within the Chinese economy and Gou’s political ideals, I’m not sure he even can or wants to.”

It’s true that Gou is still an unknown political entity, and – if elected – he may end up shocking the pundits and fighting China until his last breath in the name of Taiwan’s independence. But then again, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016, and although he claimed to be a populist, so far he’s: (1) signed a tax bill that benefits corporations and upper-income earners over others; (2) obsessively attempted to repeal Obamacare, which mainly aids the poor and uninsured; and (3) led an ongoing campaign of deregulation that’s left more US workers vulnerable to exploitation and injury. But maybe that just proves the truth of the old adage that ‘a leopard never changes its spots’?

Gou, like Trump, is known for attacking the press and charging it with disseminating ‘fake news’, as well as having a harsh personal style – one that recently led him to walk out of a public forum when a DPP lawmaker didn’t look at him while he was speaking. He also seems to have a penchant for controversial quotes, as he once stated that “the harem should not meddle in politics” in reference to his wife’s objections to him running for office (the obvious implication being that a president isn’t so much a servant of the people as an emperor), and has dropped the bombshell that “democracy alone does not provide food to eat.” While this latter statement may technically be true, every voter in Taiwan should be asking themselves: ‘But then what exactly is the alternative?’

Author / Peter K. Thompson

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

川普 政治 總統大選 郭台銘
2019-05-16 Peter K. Thompson

Post navigation

破解柯文哲的兩岸話術 → ← 民調與初選,鹿死誰手還不一定

Related Posts

中促沙伊復交 台灣應謹慎因應

在中國的斡旋下,中東地區的世仇沙烏地阿拉伯與伊朗宣布復交,引發全球矚目。伊朗與沙烏地阿拉伯分別係伊斯蘭教分支什葉派和遜尼派的領袖,宗教上本就為宿敵,2016年兩國斷交的背景係沙國處決了知名什葉派穆斯林教士,伊朗民眾至沙國駐德黑蘭大使館展開強烈抗議,葉門內戰更是兩國的代理人戰爭,敵對甚久的兩個伊斯蘭政權宣佈復交,自然引起舉世議論了。         沙伊復交並非全由中國促成,事實上,兩國自2021年開始,就在伊拉克斡旋下展開6輪高層會談,但兩國最終刻意選在北京完成最後一哩路,讓中國收割復交之功,反映出中沙伊三國博弈的各取所需,分述如下:         首先在伊朗方面,自美國2018年退出伊朗核子協議並重啟對伊朗的制裁後,伊朗在經貿或地緣上都面臨孤立,自然也樂見北京促成其與另一個中東大國復交,以擺脫「國際孤兒」的困境。         對沙烏地阿拉伯而言,沙國是美國在中東的重要盟友,其以石油換取美國對沙國的軍備保證。然而近來美國視中國為頭號戰略威脅,遂抽調投注中東的戰略資源回防印太,包含美國表示不再支持沙烏地介入葉門內戰及撤軍阿富汗等事件,都宣告中東已邁入後美國時代,沙烏地阿拉伯自覺安全保障無法再單靠美國,遂開始與力足影響中東局勢的大國發展多元的平衡外交,如在俄烏戰爭爆發後,沙國不配合美國增產原油,反而是與俄羅斯協調後減產原油;去年12月習近平出訪沙國時,雙方簽署了「全面戰略夥伴關係協議」,並同意每兩年在兩國輪流舉行一次元首會晤,如今也在中國促成下與伊朗復交。         最後是中國,斡旋沙伊兩國握手復交,營造出中國調停爭端、勸和促談的大國形象,為中國的《全球安全倡議概念文件》、《關於政治解決烏克蘭危機的中國立場》提出渾厚底氣。殊值台灣注意的是,在美國逐步退出中東,俄羅斯也因深陷俄烏戰爭泥淖而無暇分神經營之際,與中東遜尼派和什葉派領袖俱交好的中國,將成中東地緣政治的主導者,這將大大不利於台灣在中東的外交空間;更重要的是,2022年台灣原油進口國前十名就有沙烏地阿拉伯、卡達等六個中東國家,卡達還居台灣液化天然氣進口國首位,若中國於中東發揮影響力削弱台灣的能源供應,將對台灣造成致命性衝擊,政府當局應預作推演,謹慎以待。 作者/王昱培

侯友宜市長,你好大的膽子!

侯友宜過去漠不關心,事不關己的兩岸關係,現在他想當總統,你我小公民們當然要知道侯市長如何「和中親美」?選民的要求,有如排山倒海,侯市長不知所措,原來「侯侯做代誌」,可不是他「驚堂一木」,他說了就算! 馬英九前總統建議侯市長需要「補習」。媒體甚至傳出前總統推薦他曾經重用過的「補教名師」蘇起和趙春山,為侯市長「惡補」。可惜侯市長還沒機會「惡補」,馬前總統月底就要啟程,訪問中國,以「祭祖」之名,進行他的「和中之旅」,暫時把侯市長「放鴿子」。 侯市長您說來真慘,不但看不到「考卷」長的是哪個模樣?內容所問會是如何?沒有名師再三補習,耳提面命,又沒有摹擬考過,侯市長白紙一張,如何做答? 都要怪蔡英文總統居心叵測,神機妙算,選在這個時候,藉訪問中南美友邦,順道訪美,宣揚她的「親美」之道,逼得中國眼中的「馬先生」不得不「訪中」,互別苗頭,只好把侯市長當「鴿子」拋!套用韓國瑜夫人當年的金句:被人在背後「放槍」(或「放鴿子」),那種感覺不是很好受!—- 侯市長,您私下的感覺如何 ? 你我小公民們就想在這「關鍵時刻」,把侯市長「白紙一張」檢審一下,把他心中最深層的底蘊挖出來,是不是「藍皮綠骨」就是「侯侯做代誌」? 馬前總統當然相信侯市長「白紙一張」,只要找對人在白紙上塗抹,要「各表」、「同表」、「一國兩制」、「台灣方案」,萬改不變其宗,任君選擇,又不是「刻骨除毒」;要「化獨漸統」,侯市長是最容易下手的模具,假以時日必為典範 ! 所以,侯市長會如何看馬英九的「和中之旅」,當然是樂觀其成。人家雖然稱馬是「馬先生」,有失待客之道,我們不是一直說「兩岸各不隸屬」嗎?人家不稱他為「馬前總統」,而是「馬先生」,不是坐實了「互不隸屬」嗎?錯不在對方,而是在我方,我們為甚麼不稱習總書記是「習先生」呢?這不就是「互相尊重」、「同等對待」嗎? 侯友宜市長,如果馬前總統重用的「智慧之士」給你上課,雖然您是「白紙一張」,許多台灣小公民們會希望第一堂課,你就能向蘇、趙教授們提出:我很想稱習總書記為「習先生」,可以嗎?許多台灣選民相信馬前總統、蘇教授、趙教授等一般人馬一定急著回答:原來你真的是「藍皮綠骨」,「侯友宜市長,你好大的膽子!」 作者/顧憲同

吳斯懷們:用黃埔軍魂包裝的被統戰現實!

近日,中國共產黨藉黃埔軍校校慶,來吸引在台的黃埔校友們赴中參與校慶活動。這個舉動很容易聯想到,正是要吃台灣豆腐,也把國軍、解放軍都是一家親的形象,放送國際。 對此,國內產生反對的聲音。然而,吳斯懷委員卻在媒體前表示,不擔心這些都已90多歲的退役老榮民們,前往中國會受到統戰的危機。還大聲說,要對台灣民主有信心!事實上,選在這個時機點邀請台灣校友。對照過去吳斯懷赴中聽訓的顯眼照片,就不難理解這個共犯結構,正是中國共產黨在台的內應組織,藉以凸顯台灣內部的分裂,還有敵我意識的缺乏。 有趣的是,如果真如吳斯懷所說,要用三民主義反統戰,那應當有實際作為,而非默默坐在台下乖得像隻小狗狗。這也可以望見,台灣當前的挑戰跟處境,時時都在影響國人的信心與未來。底下,將從幾個面向來探討:「1. 若執意赴中,是否有相關取消退休金的罰則;2. 訴諸言論自由,卻對自己的行為不負責,成為罔顧國人安全的危害,要如何逞處;3. 黃埔軍魂是假的,懼共才是真的,此刻政府應當趁機一網打盡。」 首先,若執意赴中,是否有相關取消退休金的罰則。斷了這些黃埔退將的金援,是台灣能保有尊嚴的最後溫柔。若當年被共產黨追殺而敗逃台灣,此刻卻要配合中國一同作賤台灣,那可真是罪該萬死。對不起創黨的先烈,這可不僅用可恥就足以形容!其實,只要讓這些口中聲稱自己有黃埔軍魂的愛國烈士們,知道要赴中聽訓的代價,會比不去來得巨大非常、非常多,相信這些一意孤行的傢伙們,就能看在「錢」的份上,好好待在台灣了。說起來可憐,但卻是異常真實的景況。 再者,訴諸言論自由,卻對自己的行為不負責,成為罔顧國人安全的危害,要如何逞處。吳斯懷們要將赴中的責任輕描淡寫成「自由遷徙的自己」。還開口閉口稱自己是「一般百姓」。這就是關鍵所在,如果真的是一般百姓,大家應該不會有太多質疑。相反地,若是握有相關機密,又享有退休後的高額厚祿,那麼這是完全不能被國人所接受的。也因此,吳斯懷們只講自己所想要的權利,卻閉口不言軍人所該承擔的責任,這是相當可惡的,也是為自己醜陋的行為脫罪的一種狡詐手法,不能不慎,更應主動破陣! 最後,黃埔軍魂是假的,懼共才是真的,此刻政府應當趁機一網打盡。吳斯懷們的國共唱和,實則在挑戰國家的底線。假若沒有任何條件、限制跟罰則,只會讓人更加有恃無恐,使得戰前的敵我意識不清,也對時不時的共機繞台聰耳不明,這不是懦夫,誰才是懦夫呢?黃埔軍魂不過如此,吳斯懷們讓人汗顏,也深覺可悲! 用黃埔軍魂包裝的被統戰現實看吳斯懷們,可以發現:「砍掉退將的退休金,是最有效的方式;政府帶頭做出懲戒,才能立下威信;黃埔軍魂不就是敗逃來台的懦夫,不值得吹噓,好好反省才是。」 作者/黃宗玄

謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」,誰說的?

逢中國必自稱「馬先生」的前總統馬英九將於3月27日至4月7日率團赴中國祭祖,觀感不佳之時,民眾黨主席柯文哲又來蹭聲量!柯文哲「胡謅」前行政院長謝長廷在2012年卸任閣揆之後前往中國訪問被稱讚是「飲水思源」,如今馬英九要去就變成賣台統戰,試圖帶起「綠能,你不能」的雙標風向。 謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」,誰說的?筆者考究2012年多家媒體對於謝長廷訪中的報導如下。 民進黨前中國事務部主任賴怡忠表示,謝長廷訪中對於民進黨內已產生化學效應,對中政策的制定需要指標性政治人物去中國才行,否則無法和中國當局對話。他認為,謝長廷這次訪中是「朝聖之旅」,只要氣氛良好、沒有和共產黨鬧翻,就能向中國、向台灣內部顯現出可以處理中國事務的樣子,試圖摘掉民進黨「逢中必反」的帽子。 時任立法院長的王金平當時表示,謝長廷訪問中國將促使民進黨對中國問題更加重視,有助於兩岸和平發展和推動。 台灣守護民主平台協會會長徐偉群則提醒政治人物與中國政權來往時,不應該跨越民主底線。他感覺不到謝長廷此行有提到台灣民主與人權的基本價值。 兩岸協議監督聯盟召集人賴中強則說,兩岸有很多問題確實要大家坐下來談,化解一些可能發生的衝突。對岸所設下的政治對話前提,國民黨在那邊敲九二共識的邊鼓,還有某些民進黨人所陷入的這些迷思,我認為都是不必要的。 親綠學者更以謝長廷訪中如同在鋼索上行走,稍一失足,就可能落入深淵、萬劫不復。試問,你我有看見或聽見柯文哲所謂的「稱讚說」嗎? 那到底是誰稱讚謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」?答案揭曉,當年的中國媒體為了統戰台灣,特地吹捧謝長廷的訪中行是一趟「不忘根源」的訪問。 柯文哲最愛「烏龍踅桌」,看準台灣人健忘的特性,用似是而非的話術帶風向、向民進黨潑髒水。筆者試問,中國媒體的統戰話語拿來胡扯「綠能,你不能」,智商157的柯文哲像極了一位壞心眼的政客。柯文哲無須替馬英九抱屈,屆時中國媒體盛讚馬英九「化獨漸統」、吃果子拜樹頭的統戰話語將蜂擁而至。亂潑政治髒水後的柯文哲從不道歉,才是典型的「柯能,你不能」,更看見素人政客的快速崩壞。 作者/秦靖

Recent Posts

中促沙伊復交 台灣應謹慎因應

中促沙伊復交 台灣應謹慎因應

在中國的斡旋下,中東地區的世仇沙烏地阿拉伯與伊朗宣布復交,引發全球矚目。伊朗與沙烏地阿拉伯分別係伊斯蘭教分支什葉派和遜尼派的領袖,宗教上本就為宿敵,2016年兩國斷交的背景係沙國處決了知名什葉派穆斯林教士,伊朗民眾至沙國駐德黑蘭大使館展開強烈抗議,葉門內戰更是兩國的代理人戰爭,敵對甚久的兩個伊斯蘭政權宣佈復交,自然引起舉世議論了。         [...]

More Info
侯友宜市長,你好大的膽子!

侯友宜市長,你好大的膽子!

侯友宜過去漠不關心,事不關己的兩岸關係,現在他想當總統,你我小公民們當然要知道侯市長如何「和中親美」?選民的要求,有如排山倒海,侯市長不知所措,原來「侯侯做代誌」,可不是他「驚堂一木」,他說了就算! [...]

More Info
謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」,誰說的?

謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」,誰說的?

逢中國必自稱「馬先生」的前總統馬英九將於3月27日至4月7日率團赴中國祭祖,觀感不佳之時,民眾黨主席柯文哲又來蹭聲量!柯文哲「胡謅」前行政院長謝長廷在2012年卸任閣揆之後前往中國訪問被稱讚是「飲水思源」,如今馬英九要去就變成賣台統戰,試圖帶起「綠能,你不能」的雙標風向。 謝長廷訪中是「飲水思源」,誰說的?筆者考究2012年多家媒體對於謝長廷訪中的報導如下。 [...]

More Info
吳斯懷們:用黃埔軍魂包裝的被統戰現實!

吳斯懷們:用黃埔軍魂包裝的被統戰現實!

近日,中國共產黨藉黃埔軍校校慶,來吸引在台的黃埔校友們赴中參與校慶活動。這個舉動很容易聯想到,正是要吃台灣豆腐,也把國軍、解放軍都是一家親的形象,放送國際。 [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way