社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

China’s Election-Meddling Power Is Growing

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意
  • 評論

Their Russia-like anti-democracy operation was unveiled during Taiwan’s mid-term elections last year, when Beijing used every tool at its disposal to stir confusion among voters and ruin the credibility of candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party

the origin of the picture source: Asia Review
the origin of the picture source: Asia Review

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past several years, you’re probably aware that Russia attempted to influence the US presidential election of 2016 through a large-scale social-media and hacking campaign (how much of an effect they actually had on the results is another matter). But did you know that right now, China is doing the same thing in Taiwan ahead of its 2020 presidential election?
Their Russia-like anti-democracy operation was unveiled during Taiwan’s mid-term elections last year, when Beijing used every tool at its disposal to stir confusion among voters and ruin the credibility of candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP; who are against closer ties with the mainland and opposed to unification with it) and their incumbent president, Tsai Ing-wen. This was accomplished through the dissemination of false news stories and other disinformation on social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter, online chat groups, messaging apps such as Line, and the online bulletin board known as PTT.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a massive force of online trolls and commenters – dubbed the ‘50 Cent Army’ – that’s constantly online pushing Beijing’s agenda to innocent users. Examples of fake news stories include one about how some of Taiwan’s last remaining allies were poised to abandon it, and another that claimed China had rescued dozens Taiwanese people stranded in Japan during Typhoon Jebi after their own government failed them – an untrue story that apparently led a Taiwanese diplomat in Osaka to commit suicide. And besides its widespread disinformation campaign, the Chinese government may also have used back-door channels to fund Taiwanese candidates friendly to its cause in 2018, numerous cases of which are now being investigated on the island.

Actually, the election-meddling activities of Russia and China are eerily similar, with some contending Beijing copied its game plan from Moscow. For example, in the 2016 US election, when Russia infiltrated the social media sphere with fake user accounts and bots to stoke division and spread extremist ideology, the overall goal was to get their preferred candidate (Donald Trump) elected, as Hillary Clinton had repeatedly taken a hardline stance against Putin’s regime in the past. The results? Trump squeaked out a narrow victory that was no doubt affected – at least in part – by both the online discord sown by Moscow and the publication of Democratic emails that were reportedly hacked by Russian agents.

Fast-forward to last year in Taiwan, when the Chinese undertook a similar campaign of social-media cyberwarfare to get voters to choose candidates from the party it wanted to see in office (the Kuomintang, who have a more China-friendly stance than the DPP). As with Russia in 2016, China succeeded – at least based on the outcome of the election. The DPP’s share of 22 cities and counties fell from 18 to 6, and they lost long-held bastions of support like the southern city of Kaohsiung. And while it’s impossible to know just how many voters were swayed by outside influences – as opposed to internal issues – it should give everyone in the free world pause that history has so quickly, and disturbingly, repeated itself.

Looking towards the 2020 Taiwan presidential election, Tsai’s administration expects to see more of the same – fake news and other types of disinformation being pushed through various online channels from beyond its borders. As the president herself said, “fake news warfare from the outside poses challenges to Taiwan, just as Europe is challenged by terrorism.” In response, her government announced in March that it would block the popular online streaming services of the Chinese companies Baidu and Tencent due to national security concerns. In addition, a movement has recently been sweeping Taiwan’s university campuses calling for a boycott of TV stations with an alleged pro-China bias in their news reporting.

Given what the Russians were able to accomplish in the US, the scary part about all of this is that China is bigger, badder and has vastly more resources at its disposal than Moscow did. Some analysts suggest Taiwan’s midterm elections may have just been a test-run of Beijing’s election-interference capabilities, with greater targets on the horizon … including the upcoming US presidential election.

In fact, last December, a group of US senators declared: “CCP’s attempts to erode democratic processes and norms around the world threaten US partnerships and prosperity. Allegations such as those surrounding Taiwan’s recent elections must, therefore, be pursued with seriousness and urgency.” While we applaud these senators for their statement, we can only hope the US and other freedom-loving nations step in sooner rather than later to combat such willful interference in fair elections by engaging in some cyberwarfare of their own in Taiwan’s defense. Essentially, if the forces of good are to prevail in the global propaganda war, it will be necessary for all of us to band together against democracy’s common enemies, because – as the ancient Chinese proverb says – “Tyranny is fiercer than a tiger” (苛政猛于虎).

Author / Cathy Lin

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

China election false news internet attack Russia
2019-04-24 林凱西

Post navigation

妙天或妙禪?傻傻分不清楚? → ← 你知道中國正在看你嗎?

Related Posts

正面迎戰

台灣軍備與中國新式軍備若進入正面衝突,結果高度可預期:短期內以「高強度、飽和打擊、關鍵節點癱瘓」為主軸,戰場首先不是灘岸決戰,而是資訊、指管通情、空海軍基地與後勤節點的存續。多個公開兵推與研究都指出,開戰初期飛彈與遠程精準火力會大量消耗守方的機場、港口與地面防空資產,迫使防禦轉向分散、機動與韌性維持,並把核心目標從「逐件攔截」改為「維持作戰功能」。 中國是否有辦法用導彈破壞台灣重要基礎建設。能力層面,解放軍的火箭軍、巡弋飛彈與精準打擊鏈條,確實具備對固定且可識別目標造成嚴重破壞的潛在能力;其演練也多次呈現「模擬打擊關鍵基礎設施」的訊號。 但「能破壞」不等於「能達成戰略目的」。基礎設施分為可快速修復與難以修復兩類:電力、通訊、交通樞紐即使被擊中,仍可能透過備援、繞路、快速搶修與分區供應恢復部分功能;相反地,若長期反覆打擊、結合網攻與封鎖,才更可能把社會運作壓到臨界點。RAND 對台灣民防與韌性研究強調,戰時關鍵在於供電、通訊、物流、醫療等體系的「持續運作能力」而非零損。 台灣國防報告也把「韌性、備援、整體防衛」作為重要方向,反映官方已將「被打仍能運作」視為必備假設。 台灣是否武裝以備就可以和共軍打仗。答案是:台灣能打,但「打得贏」取決於戰型與外部變數。若是全面登陸入侵,防衛的可行路徑是以不對稱方式提高解放軍跨海投送成本,把戰局拉長,讓其後勤與政治承受不起。CSIS 兵推多次出現「代價巨大、勝負取決於介入與補給」的結論,顯示台灣單靠傳統對稱軍備很難在火力與產能上長期對拚,但能透過地面防禦、機動火力、海空拒止、分散指管與民防韌性,讓入侵變成不可承受的賭局。 因此,互戰的現實結果更可能呈現三點:第一,初期基礎設施與軍事節點受損顯著,社會成本高;第二,台灣若能維持指管、分散戰力、快速修復與持續補給,就能維持拒止;第三,戰爭走向會被封鎖強度、外援速度、國際制裁與資訊戰效果共同塑形,而不只是單純的飛彈交換。 蔡文邦  

China’s Claims Over Taiwan and the Question of Force

China has consistently asserted that Taiwan is part of its territory and that reunification is inevitable. This position is not new, but in recent years Beijing has repeated it with […]

民進黨退此一步,即無死所 !

對於藍白黨的欺壓,干法亂紀,民進黨退無所退,退此一步,即無死所 ! 民進黨不要再存婦人之仁,「與人為善」,可不要以當年蔣經國金言「打落牙齒和血吞」為念,非到失敗不輕言失敗!—— 你們真的不知道你們還剩下甚麼?眼前的一塊鬆土,再退一步,就是懸崖峭壁! 你們不要希望綠營廣大羣眾會再當你們的「保鑣」、「禁衞軍」、「青鳥」,只要以台灣為名,一呼百應,會再拉你們一把!人若不懂得「自助」,還希求他人幫助?即使心存仁厚,以「自由民主」為至上價值的台灣人民,也會心灰意冷! 你們這幾年來是不是吃的太肥厚了,行動失能,好吃好吃,所以「爭權奪利」,禍起蕭牆,看得出還有「理想」的依存嗎?是不是需要學習習近平主席的「莫忘初衷」,以敵為師,來警告和激勵你們! 台灣人民等著看,只剩下「不副署」、「不公告」唯一的憲政救命繩索,民進黨會不會仍然「該硬不硬」,跟人家搓圓仔湯,與人為善嗎 !容忍比自由重要,君子雖可欺之以直,當「偽君子」又何妨 ? 你們不懂得自己也就罷了,你們可不要不懂得你們的敵人,要繼續「大仁大義」,再說百次千次,總有一次敵人會回心轉意,那就等著萬劫不復的命運 :不要相信民進黨某大人物的妖言「台灣人民不選我(民進黨),選誰?」 世變日急,萬物再迅速變動中,台灣人民可不會再「命定的」跟著你們,他們一定會另找新機。香港的「民主黨」內外交迫,不得不「解散」:殷鑑不遠,雖是老話,民進黨真的有人會放在心上? 民進黨諸位大公貴人,生死存亡之際,記得另個史實:南宋的末日,蒙古騎兵追捕,無步可退 ;忠臣陸秀夫背著、綁住幼主,跳厓自盡,跟著跳厓有數百名南宋官員和宗親:南宋的「幼主」,就等於台灣的「自由民主」!誰會是台灣的「陸秀夫」和數百名忠心耿耿的官員和宗室 ? 作者: 戴震

國民黨的成本

在經歷一場大規模罷免選戰後,國民黨實際上已付出極高的政治成本。這不只是輸贏問題,而是組織能量、資金結構與內部信任的全面消耗。罷免戰役動員了大量地方系統、黨工與金主資源,卻未能換來對等的政治回報,反而加深社會對藍營「動輒以對抗取代治理」的負面印象。 在這樣的背景下,黨主席鄭麗文仍需面對一個極為現實的問題:每月高達三千萬台幣的黨工人事支出。這筆錢不是抽象數字,而是來自地方募款、企業捐助與政治信用的總和。當黨的勝選前景轉弱、金主信心動搖時,主席是否還能穩定承擔這樣的現金流壓力,本身就是一場硬仗。 更關鍵的是「倒戈後還爬得起來嗎」這個問題。大罷免若被外界解讀為戰略誤判或政治冒進,責任最終必然回到黨中央。一旦地方派系與中間金主開始切割,鄭麗文在黨內的權威將不再來自職位,而取決於她是否仍被視為「能帶黨走向勝利的人」。政治現實很殘酷:沒有勝算的主席,黨內耐心通常不會太久。 這種情勢勢必影響明年的縣市長提名。提名本質上是資源配置與風險控管的結果,而不是單純的派系協商。如果黨中央財務吃緊、民調走弱,地方實力派候選人將更傾向保守操作,甚至出現延後表態、觀望、或要求更大自主權的狀況。部分搖擺選區,也可能出現黨中央提名力下降、地方各自為政的現象。 總結來看,大罷免不只是一次政治攻防,而是一場對國民黨「組織耐久度」的壓力測試。鄭麗文是否還能站得住腳,關鍵不在於她的立場強硬與否,而在於她能否在資金、提名與勝選機率之間重新建立一個讓黨內相信值得繼續下注的敘事。若做不到,影響的不只是一任主席,而是整個藍營接下來數年的選舉結構。 作者:那麼

Recent Posts

正面迎戰

正面迎戰

台灣軍備與中國新式軍備若進入正面衝突,結果高度可預期:短期內以「高強度、飽和打擊、關鍵節點癱瘓」為主軸,戰場首先不是灘岸決戰,而是資訊、指管通情、空海軍基地與後勤節點的存續。多個公開兵推與研究都指出,開戰初期飛彈與遠程精準火力會大量消耗守方的機場、港口與地面防空資產,迫使防禦轉向分散、機動與韌性維持,並把核心目標從「逐件攔截」改為「維持作戰功能」。 [...]

More Info
China’s Claims Over Taiwan and the Question of Force

China’s Claims Over Taiwan and the Question of Force

China has consistently asserted that Taiwan is part of its territory and that reunification is inevitable. This position is not new, but in recent years Beijing has repeated it with […]

More Info
民進黨退此一步,即無死所 !

民進黨退此一步,即無死所 !

對於藍白黨的欺壓,干法亂紀,民進黨退無所退,退此一步,即無死所 ! 民進黨不要再存婦人之仁,「與人為善」,可不要以當年蔣經國金言「打落牙齒和血吞」為念,非到失敗不輕言失敗!—— 你們真的不知道你們還剩下甚麼?眼前的一塊鬆土,再退一步,就是懸崖峭壁! [...]

More Info
國民黨的成本

國民黨的成本

在經歷一場大規模罷免選戰後,國民黨實際上已付出極高的政治成本。這不只是輸贏問題,而是組織能量、資金結構與內部信任的全面消耗。罷免戰役動員了大量地方系統、黨工與金主資源,卻未能換來對等的政治回報,反而加深社會對藍營「動輒以對抗取代治理」的負面印象。 [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way