社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

China’s Election-Meddling Power Is Growing

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意
  • 評論

Their Russia-like anti-democracy operation was unveiled during Taiwan’s mid-term elections last year, when Beijing used every tool at its disposal to stir confusion among voters and ruin the credibility of candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party

the origin of the picture source: Asia Review
the origin of the picture source: Asia Review

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past several years, you’re probably aware that Russia attempted to influence the US presidential election of 2016 through a large-scale social-media and hacking campaign (how much of an effect they actually had on the results is another matter). But did you know that right now, China is doing the same thing in Taiwan ahead of its 2020 presidential election?
Their Russia-like anti-democracy operation was unveiled during Taiwan’s mid-term elections last year, when Beijing used every tool at its disposal to stir confusion among voters and ruin the credibility of candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP; who are against closer ties with the mainland and opposed to unification with it) and their incumbent president, Tsai Ing-wen. This was accomplished through the dissemination of false news stories and other disinformation on social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter, online chat groups, messaging apps such as Line, and the online bulletin board known as PTT.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a massive force of online trolls and commenters – dubbed the ‘50 Cent Army’ – that’s constantly online pushing Beijing’s agenda to innocent users. Examples of fake news stories include one about how some of Taiwan’s last remaining allies were poised to abandon it, and another that claimed China had rescued dozens Taiwanese people stranded in Japan during Typhoon Jebi after their own government failed them – an untrue story that apparently led a Taiwanese diplomat in Osaka to commit suicide. And besides its widespread disinformation campaign, the Chinese government may also have used back-door channels to fund Taiwanese candidates friendly to its cause in 2018, numerous cases of which are now being investigated on the island.

Actually, the election-meddling activities of Russia and China are eerily similar, with some contending Beijing copied its game plan from Moscow. For example, in the 2016 US election, when Russia infiltrated the social media sphere with fake user accounts and bots to stoke division and spread extremist ideology, the overall goal was to get their preferred candidate (Donald Trump) elected, as Hillary Clinton had repeatedly taken a hardline stance against Putin’s regime in the past. The results? Trump squeaked out a narrow victory that was no doubt affected – at least in part – by both the online discord sown by Moscow and the publication of Democratic emails that were reportedly hacked by Russian agents.

Fast-forward to last year in Taiwan, when the Chinese undertook a similar campaign of social-media cyberwarfare to get voters to choose candidates from the party it wanted to see in office (the Kuomintang, who have a more China-friendly stance than the DPP). As with Russia in 2016, China succeeded – at least based on the outcome of the election. The DPP’s share of 22 cities and counties fell from 18 to 6, and they lost long-held bastions of support like the southern city of Kaohsiung. And while it’s impossible to know just how many voters were swayed by outside influences – as opposed to internal issues – it should give everyone in the free world pause that history has so quickly, and disturbingly, repeated itself.

Looking towards the 2020 Taiwan presidential election, Tsai’s administration expects to see more of the same – fake news and other types of disinformation being pushed through various online channels from beyond its borders. As the president herself said, “fake news warfare from the outside poses challenges to Taiwan, just as Europe is challenged by terrorism.” In response, her government announced in March that it would block the popular online streaming services of the Chinese companies Baidu and Tencent due to national security concerns. In addition, a movement has recently been sweeping Taiwan’s university campuses calling for a boycott of TV stations with an alleged pro-China bias in their news reporting.

Given what the Russians were able to accomplish in the US, the scary part about all of this is that China is bigger, badder and has vastly more resources at its disposal than Moscow did. Some analysts suggest Taiwan’s midterm elections may have just been a test-run of Beijing’s election-interference capabilities, with greater targets on the horizon … including the upcoming US presidential election.

In fact, last December, a group of US senators declared: “CCP’s attempts to erode democratic processes and norms around the world threaten US partnerships and prosperity. Allegations such as those surrounding Taiwan’s recent elections must, therefore, be pursued with seriousness and urgency.” While we applaud these senators for their statement, we can only hope the US and other freedom-loving nations step in sooner rather than later to combat such willful interference in fair elections by engaging in some cyberwarfare of their own in Taiwan’s defense. Essentially, if the forces of good are to prevail in the global propaganda war, it will be necessary for all of us to band together against democracy’s common enemies, because – as the ancient Chinese proverb says – “Tyranny is fiercer than a tiger” (苛政猛于虎).

Author / Cathy Lin

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

China election false news internet attack Russia
2019-04-24 林凱西

Post navigation

妙天或妙禪?傻傻分不清楚? → ← 你知道中國正在看你嗎?

Related Posts

全民的726:從大罷免到新民意

今年7月26日將舉行喧騰近一年的立委大罷免投票,此一堪比大型選舉的罷免運動,從單純對國會亂象而生的公民運動,走向顏色衝突;隨著藍營反罷不利,由國台辦出面指示台灣人不可罷藍,無疑從公共事務、政黨競爭走向統獨認同。故大罷免不是對藍白鬧國會的表態,而是決定藍綠白選民版圖、政治人物前途,甚至涵蓋台灣前途與政治社會穩定。              為何筆者將大罷免提升至國家選舉層級?人民必須透過投票,為一年來朝野緊張引發的社會對立,以「少數服從多數」的原則來解決諸多爭議。首先,是憲政層面。依據我國制度,行政權與立法權是我們一人一票選出,都有直接民主性,不該以強凌弱、竟一權宰制他四權,必須用直接民意來審視立法院長臂管轄是否有理,不能讓人民納稅錢來供養一個空轉的政府。              其次,是大罷免期間政府作為、賴總統言論或其他事件常被染上敏感的罷免問題,使得行政中立或個人言論被套上群眾審查的框架。例如:陸配事件、政府人事、間碟滲透或立委隱私等,蓋淪為對方陣營用以反罷之口實,經渲染後再度加深社會對立,故政治上的定紛止爭仍須由政治解決,人民用選票給煽風點火的政客、網紅一個教訓是必要的。      再來,大罷免竟扯上統獨問題、中美角力等意識形態。原本藍營在台灣地方、中國大陸與美國都有游移空間,然隨著領導失能導致目前三方皆空。地方諸侯漸與中央離心、藍營被國台辦認證恐加深選民反感、美國因預算案封殺而疑心。以上三失,除非近期有重大悲劇敘事來感動選民;或是自從去年選舉時,柯文哲所謂其有數百萬選民支持,化作實體選票,表演一場神兵天降,否則我們只看到由白營點火的亂卻由藍營承擔。                此外,大罷免的結果也影響賴朱領導地位,連帶影響權力交替與明年選舉,全民應正視大罷免帶來多方面深遠影響盡量出門投票,特別是台灣內部問題,引來對岸直接干預,更有某位網紅將利用大罷免蹭一波流量,不減顛倒是非及操作國族仇恨,無疑令國人「兩千萬總白癡化」,藉由逢迎對岸或善變立場,這不是良好的社會風氣,正需新民意來澄清亂象。             […]

賴清德團結國家第二講:解讀雜質說的意義

總統賴清德近日來到桃園舉行「團結國家十講」第二講,他在會中提及,「要用民主加以淬煉,透過一次次的選舉、罷免,一張張的選票,像打鐵、鑄劍般千錘百鍊,百鍊成鋼,打掉雜質,淬煉出捍衛主權、守護民主的鋼鐵意志。」,引發在野黨的不滿。 但老實講,賴清德的原意只是要表達,透過民主可以守護台灣而已,但是藍白為了動員反罷免選票,刻意將「雜質」連接到自己,形成對號入座式的悲情笑話。 不過若從進步史觀的角度而言,若未來要強化台灣的主權、守護台灣的安全、打造韌性的經濟體系,最好的方法依舊是打造強而有力的政府,其中團結的人民、保衛台灣的共識,是存在的必要條件。 因此,藍白自以為要被清算,其實是合理的出發點,這種「講者無心,聽者有意」的思想,正是他們激起危機意識的手段。因此賴清德提出「雜質說」,看似可能激化大罷免情勢,但其實他的初衷其實是「團結」,他一直相信「用更大的民主可以解決民主問題」。 只可惜,賴清德不是蔡英文這種字句斟酌的領導人,也非類似陳水扁的民意型領袖,他一時好心,卻成為在野黨大作文章的題材,恐是他一時沒有料到的。 很多民眾批評賴清德「鴨霸」,但這恐怕才是對他最大的誤解,在大罷免一階初期,賴清德表現相當克制,在二階連署愈來愈火熱當下,民進黨秘書長林右昌還出面說「大罷免非常態」,可見賴清德願意擔任「全民總統」,但是無奈藍白是不講理的族群。 對賴清德而言,「打掉雜質」,只是民主必經的過程,但是在野黨硬要對號入座,解讀為「我們是被打掉的雜質」,只能說哪一天在野黨真的被打掉,那真的是自作自受。 但從「雜質說」引發的風波,對於總統賴清德是一個警惕,賴清德是認真努力的領導人,但有時候離人民的感受過遠,擔任閣揆時期曾說過「功德說」、「乾淨的媒」,雖然立意良善,但是不堪嗜血的台北輿論圈檢驗。 這次提出的「雜質說」引發的風波,也有類似的感覺,賴總統並不「鴨霸」,但是要靠近民眾,傾聽民眾的聲音,才能改善被抹黑的形象。 作者/Oscar

朱立倫主席始終迴避的「雜質」真相!

在賴清德總統「團結國家十講」第二講中,以打鐵鑄劍為例,強調台灣民主需要透過千錘百鍊、百鍊成鋼的過程,淬鍊出守護民主的鋼鐵意志。所謂「雜質」,正是指在民主淬鍊過程中,那些有損民主品質、需要透過選舉罷免等民主機制加以導正的不當行為。 國民黨主席朱立倫刻意扭曲這一比喻,將其污名化為「政治清洗」,卻對國民黨自身的種種「雜質」行徑視而不見,這種倒打一耙的手法,恰恰暴露了他不敢正視問題的心虛。 首先,國民黨立委傅崐萁率團赴中國「領旨」王滬寧,這種無視國家主權尊嚴的「雜質」行為,不僅踐踏了台灣民意,更暴露出國民黨在兩岸立場上的搖擺不定。當國民黨立委諸公畢恭畢敬地向對岸政治局常委握手、報告時,朝聖媚中的「雜質」行徑難道不該被民主機制所淬鍊掉嗎? 其次,徐巧芯的「中指門」和王鴻薇搖擺嗆聲「我們沒在怕罷免的啦!」的囂張言辭,這些對民意充滿挑釁與不屑的「雜質」表現,豈是人民公僕應有的作為嗎?當選民表達對政治的關切時,國民黨最愛以「民進黨側翼」的嘲諷口吻「抹綠」自主性高的青鳥行動與公民罷團等作為,這般傲慢的「雜質」心態豈是人民公僕該有的風範嗎? 國民黨在立法院聯手民眾黨大幅刪減政府預算,甚至將業務費削至僅剩一元,癱瘓政府運作的「雜質」手段已非理性監督,而是惡意杯葛。加上藍白兩黨強行通過諸多破壞憲政秩序的「雜質」法案,正是台灣民主需要透過千錘百鍊加以去除的對象。 面對這些顯而易見的「雜質」,民眾透過罷免權進行民主導正,何錯之有?這正是民主自我淨化的機制,如同打鐵鑄劍需要去除雜質方能成鋼一般。朱立倫主席非但不反省黨內這些「雜質」問題,卻指控民主機制是「政治清洗」,才是真正的反民主「雜質」。 明居正教授曾對國民黨老朋友說,「我沒有變綠,而是你變紅了。」筆者呼籲朱立倫主席,應該先檢視國民黨內部那些傾中親共的「雜質」作為,主動清除黨內那些紅統傾中的「雜質」,回歸到真正守護中華民國、守護台灣的立場。唯有如此,國民黨才能在台灣民主的千錘百鍊中,成為真正有益於國家的鋼鐵力量,而非阻礙民主進步的「雜質」存在。 作者:秦靖

評析美軍戰略轟炸的能力

美國空軍(U.S. Air Force)是世界上武裝力量最強的軍種,美國身為世界霸權,長期以來保有強大的戰略轟炸機隊,實際上具備「全球部署、全球打擊」的實力,至今尚無法出現競爭對手,21日美軍基於伊朗持續發展核武,基於區域、地緣戰略考量,仍在21日派遣7架B-2匿蹤轟炸機執行「午夜之錘行動」(Operation Midnight Hammer),在F-22戰機的護航下從美國本土出發給予轟炸。 據外媒顯示,美軍此次轟炸的地點包括伊朗福爾多(Fordow)、納坦茲(Natanz)與伊斯法罕(Isfahan)等地,美軍透過每架B-2攜帶2枚GBU-57巨型鑽地彈給予重點打擊,配合美軍部署在阿曼灣(Gulf of Oman)的核動力潛艦所發射的戰斧巡弋飛彈攻擊,美軍此次的任務過程中未遭到伊朗的雷達偵測,所有參與任務的機艦人員均平安返回基地,再度證明美國空軍的實力仍舊是一支具備長程打擊、全球攻擊的飛行部隊。 同樣的,身為大國的俄羅斯、中共,雖然也有部署中、長程類型的轟炸機,包括俄羅斯的TU-160,中共轟六系列、傳聞中的轟20,但俄羅斯的遠程轟炸機數量僅有14架且為非匿蹤外型,中共的轟六雖然數量超過200架,但其外型也非匿蹤構型,容易在任務執行過程中遭到敵方雷達偵測,加以航程仍未達到美軍B-2轟炸機的11000公里,因此美軍在長程轟炸任務的執行仍舊保有優勢。 欲執行戰略轟炸任務必須達到「戰略空軍」的水準,亦即任務涵蓋全球,這也是為何美軍從冷戰時期開始,大量建造長程轟炸機的原因,為降低轟炸機執行任務的過程中遭敵方偵測的機率,匿蹤的設計更是美國空軍高層所重視的性能之一,未來美軍新型的B-21轟炸機預計在2026-2027服役,屆時將替換老舊的B-1與B-2轟炸機隊,成為美軍下一世代的戰略轟炸機的主力。 「戰略轟炸」不單是保護美國在全球的空權地位,也象徵美空軍具備洲際飛行、長程轟炸的能力,縱然美國政府持續降低出兵中東地區的機率,但若該區域出現意圖挑戰美國所設下的安全紅線,最終白宮、五角大廈仍會下令出動長程轟炸機給予打擊,力求區域更為穩定,也代表美國持續重視中東地區盟友的安全。 作者:宋磊

Recent Posts

全民的726:從大罷免到新民意

全民的726:從大罷免到新民意

今年7月26日將舉行喧騰近一年的立委大罷免投票,此一堪比大型選舉的罷免運動,從單純對國會亂象而生的公民運動,走向顏色衝突;隨著藍營反罷不利,由國台辦出面指示台灣人不可罷藍,無疑從公共事務、政黨競爭走向統獨認同。故大罷免不是對藍白鬧國會的表態,而是決定藍綠白選民版圖、政治人物前途,甚至涵蓋台灣前途與政治社會穩定。             [...]

More Info
為何預言終落空,恐懼依舊存在?      

為何預言終落空,恐懼依舊存在?      

最近日本漫畫家竜樹諒預言7月5日會有大災難的事情,又讓不少人開始緊張起來。明明我們現在科技這麼發達,網路資訊這麼豐富,為什麼還是會有人相信這些沒有科學根據的預言呢?回想起來,這種事情好像每隔一段時間就會出現。2012年的世界末日說、王老師預言大地震…每次事後都證明是假的,但每次出現新的預言時,還是會有人擔心得要命。這到底是怎麼回事? [...]

More Info
賴清德團結國家第二講:解讀雜質說的意義

賴清德團結國家第二講:解讀雜質說的意義

總統賴清德近日來到桃園舉行「團結國家十講」第二講,他在會中提及,「要用民主加以淬煉,透過一次次的選舉、罷免,一張張的選票,像打鐵、鑄劍般千錘百鍊,百鍊成鋼,打掉雜質,淬煉出捍衛主權、守護民主的鋼鐵意志。」,引發在野黨的不滿。 但老實講,賴清德的原意只是要表達,透過民主可以守護台灣而已,但是藍白為了動員反罷免選票,刻意將「雜質」連接到自己,形成對號入座式的悲情笑話。 [...]

More Info
評析美軍戰略轟炸的能力

評析美軍戰略轟炸的能力

美國空軍(U.S. Air Force)是世界上武裝力量最強的軍種,美國身為世界霸權,長期以來保有強大的戰略轟炸機隊,實際上具備「全球部署、全球打擊」的實力,至今尚無法出現競爭對手,21日美軍基於伊朗持續發展核武,基於區域、地緣戰略考量,仍在21日派遣7架B-2匿蹤轟炸機執行「午夜之錘行動」(Operation Midnight [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way