社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

WHO – better health for everyone everywhere except Taiwan

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意
  • 評論

Surely the existential threat posed by disease is sufficient reason to include Taiwan in the WHA. A change in mindset is needed to make the WHO into the inclusive organization it claims to be.

The World Health Assembly (WHA), the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO), meets 20–28 May in Geneva. Although the WHO promises “better health for everyone, everywhere,” the organization systematically excludes one country from the annual discussions. Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China (ROC), has one of the world’s best medical systems and can make important scientific contributions. Yet, Taiwan is not permitted to send a delegation to WHA meetings, even with observer status, to share knowledge about urgent health threats.

WHO needs Taiwan. Photo source: CivilMedia.tw
WHO needs Taiwan. Photo source: CivilMedia.tw

This situation, like that at all United Nations (UN) venues, is a relic of the Cold War when two governments disputed which could legitimately represent China. Of course, only the People’s Republic of China (PRC) can represent the 1.386 billion people living within its jurisdiction. But what about the 23 million people who live on independently ruled Taiwan, with its Ministry of Health and Welfare entirely under Taiwanese control? What about the entire ecology of microorganisms that spread disease across borders with no regard for political disputes?

The Challenge of Preventing Pandemics

Since viruses know no boundaries and do not discriminate between citizenries, the exclusion of Taiwan is an important gap in the global health system. Taiwan learned this lesson quite painfully in 2003 when an epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) took 181 lives (27%) out of 668 confirmed cases.

In retrospect, public health experts understood that one obstacle was that Taiwan is not part of the WHO and thus could not access needed epidemiological data and virus samples in a timely fashion. Taiwanese medical professionals, excluded from face-to-face WHO meetings, had to rely on the WHO website and ask other countries (especially the USA) to share data. From 2009 to 2016, Taiwan was permitted to attend the WHA as an observer under the name Chinese Taipei. Since 2017, however, China has taken a hardline stance against Taiwan and blocked its participation.

Nowadays, the greatest threats seem to be zoonotic influenza viruses — viruses that first infect animals and then spread into human populations. Avian influenza, which affects poultry but could potentially mutate and infect humans, has appeared in two strains in Taiwan since 2003. In 2019, the main concerns are Hog cholera and African swine fever. Taiwan takes all possible measures to avoid a pandemic outbreak, including using automated sensors to test incoming air passengers for fevers and strictly enforcing laws on illegally importing meat. To be fully successful, such efforts need the international co-operation that only the WHO can provide.

Democratic Allies Support Taiwan

Political leaders from democratic countries are beginning to express concern about this situation and show support for Taiwanese participation. In 2018, the European Parliament passed a resolution saying that the exclusion of Taiwan from the WHO is not in line with EU interests. On 9 April this year, when questioned by the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade about Taiwan’s participation in the WHA, Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland replied that Canada supports Taiwan’s “participation in international multilateral fora where its presence provides important contributions to the global public good.”

Diplomats tasked with maintaining good relations with China, while supporting Taiwan’s bids for international space, make diplomatic somersaults to plead their case. In his remarks at the 40thanniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act, for example, US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State W. Patrick Murphy reiterated the long-standing American policy:

“The United States will continue to support Taiwan’s membership in international organizations where statehood is not a requirement for membership, and its meaningful participation in international organizations where statehood is a requirement

Statehood is the Issue

Pretending that there is no independent state on Taiwan overlooks the facts that Taiwan possesses a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. In fact, having all of these characteristics make it a state according to the definition of the 1933 Montevideo Convention.

Technically, Taiwan is not a state, but the ROC is. Taiwan as a society is still debating whether they should maintain the ROC, a constitutional framework that might one day enable the emergence of a larger democratic China. Beijing is impatient with Taiwan’s boisterous democracy, which means that no elected government has moved too quickly toward either independence or unification for fear of alienating voters and losing power. China thus tries to coerce Taiwan through external means, such as vetoing Taiwan’s attempts to enter the WHA.

The refusal of the WHA and other international bodies to recognize ROC statehood has two important consequences. The first is in Taiwan itself. As China succeeds in constraining Taiwan’s international space, Taiwanese people lose confidence in their government to represent them to the world. This destabilizes Taiwan’s hard-won democracy. The second consequence is that diplomats and political leaders learn to perceive Taiwan only in its relationship with China rather than as an independent sociopolitical reality.

Denying the existence of a state on Taiwan begs the question of what Taiwan actually is. Obviously, it is not a non-governmental organization like the Red Cross, which has observer status. Taiwan’s contested status in the international arena more closely resembles Palestine, which has held observer status in the WHA since 1974 and in the UN since 2012, but which is excluded from other international entities due to American opposition. Both Taiwan and Palestine are limited in their international aspirations due to great power politics, but only Palestine gains a seat at the table at the WHA. Taiwan should be no different in terms of prioritizing human health over politics.

Taiwan is already a part of several other international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. These provide sufficient precedents for pragmatically including both the PRC and the ROC. Surely the existential threat posed by disease is sufficient reason to include Taiwan in the WHA. A change in mindset is needed to make the WHO into the inclusive organization it claims to be.

Author / Scott Simon

Scott Simon, Ph.D., is Professor in the School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, Co-holder of the Chair in Taiwan Studies, and Researcher at CIPS, University of Ottawa. Proficient in both Mandarin Chinese and Japanese, he has conducted research on various social and political issues in China, Taiwan, and Japan. He is the author of three books about Taiwan.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

Taiwan WHO 國際
2019-05-22 Scott Simon

Post navigation

看郭董「舔盤子」拚形象改造 → ← 賴清德如果想退,現在是良機

Related Posts

館長呼應斬首 認敵為友且正中中共下懷

過去大力抗中,與民眾黨主席黃國昌一起反紅媒的網紅館長,不久前高調赴中,高喊中國好進步;明知中國是敵國,為了人民幣,仍舊大力跪舔,見風轉舵讓人傻眼。近日為了搏版面,竟在直播中高喊斬首總統賴清德。為了錢,甘願認敵為友,這種荒謬至極的行為不僅違法,甚至有可能上了中共的當。   館長5日在他的直播中呼應中國解放軍:「把賴清德狗頭斬下來」,並喊話中國「兄弟我等你,真的我日也思夜也思啊」,引發輿論譁然。而警政署6日表示,館長言論已超過言論自由範圍,已由刑事局主動蒐集煽動暴力言論事證,報請新北地檢署指揮偵辦。   去獨裁中國跪舔吹捧的館長,絲毫不敢對中共提出一點批評,然而回到民主自由的台灣,竟附和中國的斬首演練,稱要對總統不利,這很明顯就是公然附和敵人,甚至在許多沒有法律常識的藍白支持者心中,也有可能帶起一股反政府、違法法律的浪潮,不可不慎;除了司法單位應該介入,執政黨也應嚴肅對大眾說明,將中共的侵台惡意與認知戰揭發,並告知大眾附和敵人的侵略行動是不對的。   如台劇《零日攻擊》所演,中共侵略台灣,很重要的一步就是在地協力者。中共運用金錢收買、威逼等方式,讓黑道、政客和網紅等等作為內應,讓他們協助宣傳,甚至可能實際武力支援,都是需要小心防範的。作為曾經抗中的網紅,館長為了賺錢,不惜成為中共的傳聲筒,實在可悲。   館長煽動暴力,現在要被法辦,便出來哭喊被迫害,讓館長的粉絲降低司法信任度,這些都是中共資訊戰的一環。呼籲不論藍綠白,面對親中藝人或政客的種種操作,都應該保持警覺,切勿像館長這樣認敵為友。 作者:向陽之花

賴清德的「川普學」:外交不是辯論,是藝術   

  賴清德總統日前受訪,談到美國前總統川普若能讓中國放棄對台動武,「那他一定是諾貝爾和平獎得主」。這句話甫一出口,立刻被媒體大書特書,有人說這是外交辭令,也有人笑說是「廢話」。但如果你仔細想,這句「廢話」背後其實蘊藏著精準的政治判斷與極高的外交智慧。 的確,不只是川普,任何能讓中國放棄武力犯台的人,毫無疑問都值得拿諾貝爾和平獎。這句話表面看似輕飄,實則避開了所有可能惹怒對方的敏感點,同時又送上了對川普最受用的禮物:誇讚。賴清德顯然已經抓到與川普打交道的關鍵,那就是:讓他爽,他就會幫你衝,當你是朋友。 外交從來不是比學問的場合,而是人性的舞台。太多政治人物喜歡「講有意義的話」,但對方不一定領情。尤其像川普這樣的角色,他不是複雜的人,不吃邏輯,只吃情緒。這種人不需要你說真理,只需要你說「你最棒」。賴清德這一句「川普若成功可得和平獎」,說穿了就是在幫川普貼金。對川普來說,這句話聽起來比任何政策承諾都更甜。 更難得的是,賴清德說這話時沒有矯情。他沒有表現出過度的諷刺,也沒有過分卑躬屈膝,而是用一種半真半玩笑的語氣,巧妙地傳達出「台灣期待和平」的立場。這種分寸拿捏得宜,既能讓白宮安心,也能讓川普高興,還能讓國內聽眾感受到幽默。這不是隨口說說,而是精算後的「軟實力」。 有人會批評這樣太「現實」、太「勢利」,但外交本來就不是道德競賽。講面子、講原則的時候太多了,講效果的時候反而太少。真正聰明的領導人,不是堅持說「有意義的話」,而是懂得在不同對象面前說「有作用的話」。賴清德這一次顯然選擇了後者。 所以,與其笑這句話是「廢話」,不如說這是「高明的廢話」。在充滿火藥味的台海局勢中,若能用一句幽默的話,讓對岸與美國都讀出各自想要的訊號,那就是一場成功的外交表演。畢竟,世界上很多危機,往往不是靠強硬的言辭,而是靠一句聰明的「客套話」被化解的。 賴清德這一課,也許應該列入未來外交官培訓教材。有時候,讓對方高興,比讓自己有理,更能換來和平。 作者:林政武

鄭麗文若勝出,國民黨必分裂

國民黨主席選舉,鄭麗文若勝出,國民黨必分裂。 所謂「分裂」當然不是指另一黨中央出現,而是有一大派人馬,一定選擇「躺平」,「寧靜杯葛」,讓你們這羣年輕、激進的「土耳其人」去胡搞? 所謂「世代革命」了,鄭主席要跟著怎麼搞,—— 崩出來是那種世代?可能連新的「鄭主席」也不清楚?是不是她只要把政論節目的那一套數,起承轉合,脫口秀,自成一家之言,就是治國平天下 ! 所以國民黨的黨中央很可能會變成「大學的辯論賽場」、「時尚走秀」,人才輩出,但這是百年大黨所要的人才嗎? 所以要「國史館」幹甚麼?朱立倫花那麼大力氣,深文周內,編寫「國民黨史觀」,隨後賴清德的「十大演講」……  ,誰在意 ?寫了,反而為天下人所笑,你們知道這是甚麼時代了!怪不得兩人政治上都不太討人喜歡! 鄭主席上任的最艱難的工作,就是境外勢力,選前排山倒海的幫助,如郝龍彬所說的,人家自然要合理的「回報」,—— 總不能說要求和日本的「高市早苗」,談談有甚麼可以合作的,有助東亞和平,算是「回報」?( 境外勢力一定認為是在尋找同謀,對付他們 !) 稍微有國際強權常識的,一定相信:鄭主席一定見不到日本的「高市早苗」,門都沒有 !幹嘛唾面自乾!這是政治現實,可不是像在政見發表會上可以雄辯滔滔,天下無難事:這個可以,那個也行,這個我要做,那個我也要做,甚麼都可做,保持多方和善和平衡關係,而且遊刃有餘 ,絕不會連爬帶滾! 那麽乾脆就取法乎上,期待能和川普總統,有個「高峯會」,如何 ?再不行,找習主席見個面,也算是差強人意了!可能嗎?—— 國台辦肯撥冗相見,已算是三生有幸了! 國民黨一向搞不清楚,自以為「很有實力」,共產黨不跟我談,要跟誰談?民進黨嗎 !——共產黨當然認為國民黨有些實力,只是至多國民黨左派「革委會」附隨組織的實力。他的最大功用是設立陷阱、地雷陣,令民進黨進退不得,用美式民主,顛覆美式民主,令民進黨內外走頭無路 !只好隨意找位 Sugar Daddy 來認 ! 鄭麗文若勝出,台灣的出路會更形險峻。因為她好像不太能了解國際強權政治的複雜,一廂情願。或許未來的鄭主席會認為,這也沒甚麼大不了的?最多也不過是令「境外勢力」渡海收拾。 國民黨似乎沒有想過( 除了蔣經國以外):它最大力量是來自能和本土力量結合。民進黨不是「首要敵人」,敵人另有其人!以民進黨為歒,只會削弱國民黨可以發揮的力量。國民黨似乎已經沒有甚麼理想,除了消滅民進黨所謂的「歷史任務」外,只會為他人火中取栗而已! 中華民國「歷史的結束」就是共產黨的「一黨專政」?鄭麗文和郝龍彬的差異,是郝龍彬似乎仍然不接受「一黨專政」的歷史結論。他的木納顯示他的謹慎。鄭麗文的腦袋和支持他的徒眾們不會深謀遠慮,把歷史的格局( […]

評韓國瑜國慶演說的虛與實

在莊嚴的國慶大典上,立法院長韓國瑜手持麥克風,高歌一曲費玉清的「國恩家慶」,試圖營造溫馨團結、其樂融融的氛圍。然而,這嘹亮的歌聲,對比其領導下的立法院所掀起的政治風暴,以及他演說中充滿矛盾的邏輯,形成了一幅極其諷刺的畫面。韓院長口中憂心忡忡的「三座隱形堰塞湖」,恐怕遠不及他與國會多數黨親手堆砌起來的那座憲政危機堰塞湖來得真實與危險。 韓國瑜在致詞中痛心疾首,呼籲「不能繼續放任黨派永無休止惡鬥」,此言猶在耳,卻讓人不禁失笑。自其上任以來,立法院上演的正是台灣民主化後最赤裸、最激烈的權力鬥爭。在「國會改革」的大旗下,由藍白兩黨聯手主導的擴權法案,不僅在立法程序上粗暴輾壓、視程序正義為無物,其實質內容更引發「毀憲亂政」的巨大爭議。這場由議場內蔓延至街頭的衝突,催生了「青鳥行動」數以萬計的公民抗爭,並點燃了烽火連天的罷免浪潮。韓國瑜身為國會議長,非但未能扮演中立的調和角色,反而成為強行通過爭議法案的關鍵議事槌。當他高談弭平惡鬥時,難道不該先自我檢討,自己正是這場撕裂台灣社會風暴的掌舵者嗎?他所憂心的黨派惡鬥,恰恰是在他的主持下被推向了新的高峰。 演說中,他提及南部水災,感念「鏟子超人」的無私奉獻,試圖展現悲天憫人的胸襟。然而,這份同理心顯然有其地理與政治的邊界。他訴說南部水災嚴重,怎不提花蓮縣馬太鞍溪堰塞湖溢流造成土石流淹沒良田、沖毀家園等怵目驚心的災情。這場災難背後,「人謀不臧」的質疑聲浪從未停歇,直指花蓮縣府的失職與疏漏。對於這場人禍的悲劇,這位心懷「復我河山、救我同胞」壯志的韓院長,卻選擇了靜默。他的關懷,獨獨略過了這片需要究責與深刻反省的災區。這種選擇性的悲憫,讓人懷疑其所謂的「憂心」,究竟是發自內心的真情,還是服務於政治算計的表演。 更令人啼笑皆非的,莫過於韓國瑜對「三座隱形堰塞湖」的定義。台海戰爭風險、黨派惡鬥,確為台灣心腹大患,但將「對美關稅談判」與之並列,則顯得不倫不類,甚至荒謬可笑。關稅談判是國際經貿往來中的常態性博弈,涉及利益交換與協商妥協,是國家發展過程中必須面對的正常挑戰。將其比擬為堰塞湖,不僅是對國際政治經濟的無知,更是刻意混淆視聽,將一個可管理、可協商的經貿議題,渲染成與戰爭同等級的生存威脅。這種拙劣的類比,除了暴露其思維淺薄,更讓人懷疑其意圖是否在於恐嚇民眾,為特定的政治議程鋪路。 韓國瑜高舉「鏟子超人」的大旗,誓言要排除威脅台灣的堰塞湖。然而,從他就任至今的所作所為來看,他和他所領導的國會,恐怕才是當前台灣最大的「人造堰塞湖」。這座堰塞湖,由踐踏憲政精神的法案堆積而成,由激化社會對立的言行澆灌而成,正一點一滴地侵蝕著台灣的民主基石。韓院長若真想成為排除險阻的「鏟子超人」,那第一鏟,應該先鏟除自己言行不一的政治虛偽。 作者: 宜和蓒

Recent Posts

館長呼應斬首 認敵為友且正中中共下懷

館長呼應斬首 認敵為友且正中中共下懷

過去大力抗中,與民眾黨主席黃國昌一起反紅媒的網紅館長,不久前高調赴中,高喊中國好進步;明知中國是敵國,為了人民幣,仍舊大力跪舔,見風轉舵讓人傻眼。近日為了搏版面,竟在直播中高喊斬首總統賴清德。為了錢,甘願認敵為友,這種荒謬至極的行為不僅違法,甚至有可能上了中共的當。   [...]

More Info
賴清德的「川普學」:外交不是辯論,是藝術   

賴清德的「川普學」:外交不是辯論,是藝術   

  賴清德總統日前受訪,談到美國前總統川普若能讓中國放棄對台動武,「那他一定是諾貝爾和平獎得主」。這句話甫一出口,立刻被媒體大書特書,有人說這是外交辭令,也有人笑說是「廢話」。但如果你仔細想,這句「廢話」背後其實蘊藏著精準的政治判斷與極高的外交智慧。 [...]

More Info
鄭麗文若勝出,國民黨必分裂

鄭麗文若勝出,國民黨必分裂

國民黨主席選舉,鄭麗文若勝出,國民黨必分裂。 所謂「分裂」當然不是指另一黨中央出現,而是有一大派人馬,一定選擇「躺平」,「寧靜杯葛」,讓你們這羣年輕、激進的「土耳其人」去胡搞? 所謂「世代革命」了,鄭主席要跟著怎麼搞,—— 崩出來是那種世代?可能連新的「鄭主席」也不清楚?是不是她只要把政論節目的那一套數,起承轉合,脫口秀,自成一家之言,就是治國平天下 ! [...]

More Info
評韓國瑜國慶演說的虛與實

評韓國瑜國慶演說的虛與實

在莊嚴的國慶大典上,立法院長韓國瑜手持麥克風,高歌一曲費玉清的「國恩家慶」,試圖營造溫馨團結、其樂融融的氛圍。然而,這嘹亮的歌聲,對比其領導下的立法院所掀起的政治風暴,以及他演說中充滿矛盾的邏輯,形成了一幅極其諷刺的畫面。韓院長口中憂心忡忡的「三座隱形堰塞湖」,恐怕遠不及他與國會多數黨親手堆砌起來的那座憲政危機堰塞湖來得真實與危險。 [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way