社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

Can Taiwan Handle a Trump-like Tycoon as President?

  • English Article
  • 時事
  • 民意

It’s true that Gou is still an unknown political entity, and – if elected – he may end up shocking the pundits and fighting China until his last breath in the name of Taiwan’s independence.

Terry Gou, a straight-talking businessman with a mercurial temper, no political experience, a disdain for the government of his country, and a vast personal fortune at his disposal is running for president. Sound familiar?

Gou and Trump. Image source: Yahoo News
Gou and Trump. Image source: Yahoo News

Just like current US prez Donald Trump – whose successful 2016 run is said to be his inspiration for entering the political fray – Gou is one the wealthiest people in his nation, Taiwan, with his net worth estimated at US$8 billion. Putting aside the issue of where exactly Gou’s loyalties lie (his company, Foxconn, is an integral part of the economic landscape of China, employing over a million workers there, while he himself has met with the upper echelons of the CCP, including Xi Jinping), a more pertinent question is whether or not Taiwan really needs a businessman running the show.

While some voters dissatisfied with the current political situation there – like many who voted for Trump in 2016 – may jump at the chance of electing a businessman to shake up the system, if we’ve learned anything from Trump’s term in office, it’s that electing a headstrong billionaire with no experience will certainly shake things up, but not necessarily in a good way …

So far, the US mogul’s presidency has been characterized by unprecedented chaos and confusion, as Trump “has the record for White House staff turnover, for cabinet turnover and … for the highest turnover within a single department,” according to scholar Kathryn Dunn Tenpas. Pick up a newspaper on any given day, and you’re sure to read about the latest scandal or controversy unfolding in the administration. So while it may sound like a good idea to elect a political outsider to drain ‘the swap’, the reality is much more complex than that. In the case of Trump, at least, it’s seems as though his hardnosed corporate leadership style has not translated all that well into the government realm, resulting in serious instability at the top.

Additionally – if Trump’s actions are in any way indicative – a profit-first (principles-second) CEO-type leader may not always obey the ethical rules and guidelines of an advanced democracy, which exist to keep the various governing powers in balance. To mention only a few examples: Trump’s dubious firing of the Director of the FBI, James Comey, when he wasn’t happy with the direction the Russia investigation against his campaign was taking; his continual lambasting of the press when they produce stories he doesn’t like; and his administration’s blanket refusal to cooperate with the investigations of the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, whose traditional function is to provide oversight of the executive branch. Basically, the attitude of a hardcore businessman towards to the well-honed machinery of government seems to be, “It’s my way or the highway, bub,” and – regardless of which side of the political spectrum you’re on – that can’t be a good thing for democracy.

Finally, just like Trump, who refused to fully separate himself from his business operations upon assuming the presidency, it’s not clear Gou would completely distance himself from Foxconn if elected. In the words of Taiwan political expert Lev Nachman, “In the same way Trump only marginally divested from his assets when he became president, I would not expect Gou to truly move away from his [company]”. Obviously, this creates a major conflict of interest, as the person in charge may be tempted to put his own good above that of the whole. To take just one example of this from Trump’s presidency, many people wonder if there’s a simple – and disturbing – reason he didn’t take a hard line against the Saudi government after the brutal murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Could it be because, as he’s said in the past, “I get along great with all of [the Saudis]. They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.”? Essentially, if you have a wealthy tycoon in office, it may be hard for him to remove himself from his business interests, as politics and commerce are often intertwined. As Nachman says, “I would be greatly concerned with Gou’s ability to separate his business from his political endeavors. Given Foxconn’s position within the Chinese economy and Gou’s political ideals, I’m not sure he even can or wants to.”

It’s true that Gou is still an unknown political entity, and – if elected – he may end up shocking the pundits and fighting China until his last breath in the name of Taiwan’s independence. But then again, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016, and although he claimed to be a populist, so far he’s: (1) signed a tax bill that benefits corporations and upper-income earners over others; (2) obsessively attempted to repeal Obamacare, which mainly aids the poor and uninsured; and (3) led an ongoing campaign of deregulation that’s left more US workers vulnerable to exploitation and injury. But maybe that just proves the truth of the old adage that ‘a leopard never changes its spots’?

Gou, like Trump, is known for attacking the press and charging it with disseminating ‘fake news’, as well as having a harsh personal style – one that recently led him to walk out of a public forum when a DPP lawmaker didn’t look at him while he was speaking. He also seems to have a penchant for controversial quotes, as he once stated that “the harem should not meddle in politics” in reference to his wife’s objections to him running for office (the obvious implication being that a president isn’t so much a servant of the people as an emperor), and has dropped the bombshell that “democracy alone does not provide food to eat.” While this latter statement may technically be true, every voter in Taiwan should be asking themselves: ‘But then what exactly is the alternative?’

Author / Peter K. Thompson

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

川普 政治 總統大選 郭台銘
2019-05-16 Peter K. Thompson

Post navigation

破解柯文哲的兩岸話術 → ← 民調與初選,鹿死誰手還不一定

Related Posts

從「好想贏韓國」到「被韓國比較」

過去很長一段時間,台灣人習慣把「好想贏韓國」掛在嘴邊。無論是體育競賽,還是經濟表現,只要稍有落差,總免不了一聲不甘的感嘆。韓國快速崛起為經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD)成員國,三星、現代等財閥更是叱吒全球,讓許多台灣人感覺相形見絀。然而,近年局勢悄然逆轉,當我們還來不及意識到時,韓國媒體已經開始主動把台灣視為比較對象。 數據最能說話。韓國的外匯存底目前是四千一百六十三億美元,台灣則高達五千九百七十四億美元,顯示台灣在金融安全網上更為穩健。股市方面,台股總市值近期突破三兆美元,來到三.零四兆美元,而韓股僅二.一七兆美元,台灣足足領先四成。回顧二〇二〇年,雙方市值都還在二兆美元上下,勢均力敵,短短五年間台灣卻拉開了一兆美元的差距。更驚人的是,台灣人口僅二千三百萬,不到韓國的一半,卻能在這些指標上取得領先,這讓人看見台灣的優勢來自實質內涵,而不是規模優勢。 這背後最核心的動力,無疑是半導體產業。台積電與其供應鏈,成為全球人工智慧與高效運算浪潮的推手,也讓台灣股市的含金量遠勝過去。相比之下,韓國雖有三星,但財閥過度集中的結構,使得整體市場活力受限,缺乏中小企業帶來的市場活力。 除了經濟,文化與社會層面的比較同樣耐人尋味。韓流雖在全球風靡,但台灣的文化軟實力也逐漸受到肯定。像是台灣的影視作品在國際影展嶄露頭角,原創音樂在華語圈中具有獨特地位,更重要的是台灣的民主活力與社會多元,被國際視為東亞少見的典範。若說韓國輸出的是高度系統化的娛樂工業,台灣展現的則是自由氛圍下的多樣創意。這種價值上的吸引力,或許不若韓流般華麗,但卻深具韌性。 當然,超越韓國並不是終點。我們真正要思考的是,在全球化競爭與地緣政治風險下,台灣如何將這些優勢轉化為長期戰略,而非曇花一現的數字勝利。台灣不需要沉浸在「終於贏過韓國」的心理,而是要把這份自信,化為持續創新的動能。 回顧過去,台灣曾經羨慕韓國的速度與魄力,如今我們走出自己的路。從「好想贏韓國」到「被韓國比較」,這不僅是一場國際排名的變化,更是一個民族心態的轉折。真正的勝利,不是證明我們比誰強,而是確信我們可以按照自己的步伐,走向世界舞台。 作者:魏世昌

趙少康是CIA 間諜 ?

泛國民黨極右派、紅統兩大言論重鎮蔡正元、邱毅,指稱前中廣董事長趙少康可能是CIA間諜。他們的邏輯運算和「連連看」的手法卻頗發人深省,有值得深究的必要! 例如,蔡先生嚴批趙董事長:「怎麼老趙也學會『抹紅』的把戲?如果依『趙氏邏輯』,中共『不制止』,就是『縱容』,中共縱容就是『介入』,那你趙少康是不是 CIA 的人?黎智英是親近CIA的人,趙少康是親近黎智英的人,所以趙少康是親近CIA 的人,是這樣的邏輯嗎 ? 蔡博士博學多聞,國民黨內外,舉世同欽,居然忘了舉另個可以震天動地的例子。他可以舉蔣經國晚年和 CIA 台北站站長,惺惺相惜,過往從密。依「趙氏邏輯」,連連看,蔣經國豈不是要成為 CIA 的人馬了 ? 你我小公民們要發現蔡、邱兩大咖,思想重鎮的謬誤,不太容易。這不在於𨗴輯的推延,而是他們分不清楚「邏輯」和「經驗事實」的差異,兩者是處在不同的範疇內。不管他們𨗴輯的推論如何適配、一致,無懈可擊,到底𨗴輯仍然是𨗴輯,不會自動就變成經驗事實。經驗事實決定一切,而不在於邏輯體系。 如果有人不諱言要「中共介入」,多多益善,甚至宣傳台灣要和平,我們要花費在國防建軍龫甚麼(候選人 鄭麗文)?這些言論重鎮、宣揚解除武裝,被稱為「紅統人士」名正而言順,有甚麼不對?中華民國的衆多小公民們,不管支持或反對「紅統」,都明白誰的腦子在想甚麼?「紅統人士」的名稱沒有甚麼可以隱誨,逃避的,不是嗎?—— 你說我「紅統」正好,我就是「紅統」,我「出櫃」了,你們要怎麼辦 ? 紅統人士不管是被視為為虎作倀,或是求仁得仁,小公民們心中有一把尺,知道誰就是誰?不必要再抬出「CIA間諜論」來反制,雄辯淊淊,邏輯深密,在小公民們眼中,紅的就是紅的,不必要再畫蛇添足,多作解釋,惹人生厭。 作者:李 隱

當《BBC》記者去跟監英國內閣官員時…

想像一下,倘若新聞報導英國第三大黨的黨魁,一位將「正義」與「監督」刻在自己政治旗幟上的國會議員,被揭露長期主導一個秘密團隊,如暗影般系統性地跟蹤、偷拍執政黨或友黨的政治人物。其核心執行者竟是一位來自英國廣播公司(BBC),那個被視為英國公信力靈魂的國家媒體記者。這位記者為了任務,甚至像間諜小說的情節般,租下了大臣私人住所的停車位,以便長驅直入,進行監控。 消息曝光的那一刻,不會是幾則新聞跑馬燈,而將是席捲全國、動搖國本的政治海嘯。 首先,風暴中心將是BBC本身,那位涉案記者會被立即停職,BBC總裁將被迫踏上一場屈辱的「謝罪之旅」,在國會與全國觀眾面前,進行最沉痛的公開道歉,力挽BBC百年來用無數真相建立起來、此刻卻已在崩塌邊緣的公信力。 《衛報》的社論會如匕首般鋒利,《泰晤士報》的頭版會進行一場不留情面的「政治驗屍」。無論媒體立場左右,都會譜出同一個調子,「對民主的攻擊」、「政治醜聞玷污國家媒體」,直指那位黨魁。 在西敏宮的神聖殿堂內,將凝聚成一股跨越黨派的集體憤怒。首相會以最嚴厲的措辭,譴責這種「腐蝕民主制度核心的劇毒」。而最大反對黨的領袖,非但不會幸災樂禍,反而會站在同一陣線,捍衛整個政治體制的尊嚴。因為所有人都明白,今天狗仔的鏡頭對準的是內閣大臣,明天就可能對準任何一位議員。國會下議院將立刻召開緊急辯論,傳喚那位黨魁到國會接受全國直播式的質詢與檢驗。 這起事件不會只停留在「政治道德」的口水戰,而是會立刻升級為「國家安全」級別的刑事案件。倫敦警察廳與軍情五處將聯手展開調查,罪名清單將包括,共謀、騷擾、侵犯隱私,甚至可能觸及《官方保密法》,並徹查資金來源是否涉及不法。至於那位黨魁,他的政治訃聞將在醜聞曝光的24小時內寫就,黨內排山倒海的壓力將逼迫他立刻辭去黨魁與國會議員的職務。 現在,讓我們將這場思想實驗的舞台拉回台灣。當民眾黨主席黃國昌被爆出主導狗仔集團,長期跟監偷拍政敵,甚至動用偽裝成「中央社」記者的雙面人,潛入官員住宅停車場時,我們沒有看到那場預期中的政治海嘯,也沒有看到排山倒海、跨越藍綠白光譜的媒體撻伐,更沒有看到在野黨政治人物同聲譴責這種破壞民主遊戲規則的行徑。 我們依舊看到黃國昌安坐於立委與黨主席的寶座,每天打開直播的鎂光燈,繼續扮演著那個不染塵埃的正義化身,辱罵被他跟監的人不斷「秀下線」、「送頭」,絲毫沒有半點反省之心。 黃國昌的跟監醜聞,就像一劑投入台灣民主水井裡的劇毒。然而,最令人驚駭的不是投毒的行為本身,而是井邊眾人的沉默。當一個社會對於此等踐踏文明底線的惡行,竟能容忍當事人繼續高談闊論、嘲諷受害者時,這意味著我們對毒素的耐受性,已經高到了危險的程度。整個台灣社會失靈的免疫系統,在在突顯台灣民主的蒼白與脆弱。   作者:秦靖

啞吧吃黃蓮,有苦說不出!

世說:啞吧吃黃蓮,有苦說不出!你我大概只要用點想像力,就可以了解其中的尷尬情境。 但是如果當事人,不是啞吧,居然也吃了黃蓮,他說的出口,又會是怎麼樣情況?會不會哀哀呀呀,我的命好苦啊 !—— 郝龍彬爺一定可以給我們他的親身經驗。 郝爺受到「境外勢力」舖天蓋地、無所逃於天地間、冷酷、造假、毫無人性的攻擊:例如說,他親吻某名女的假影片公然在網路流竄。郝爺的情況有如承受 ,「殺千刀」的酷刑。對方手段太可怕了!他只敢說「凶犯」來自「境外勢力」,是有國家級的實力,大外宣的格局。 據趙少康董事長稱:介入「境外攻擊」有八頻道、1 51部影片,182萬瀏覽次數。郝龍彬吞吞吐吐,不願明說,趙董事長明快的替他說了:「凶犯」就是對岸國台辦縱容的嘍囉們。當然是官方的,因為宣傳所費不貲,要億元以上。顯然,攻擊郝龍彬的鄭麗文境外的戰友們,不但錢多,而且出拳凶狠,直接,不離要害。 所以郝爺「與人為善」的溫吞像,吃了黃蓮,硬把苦蓮吞下肚,看來是怕「紅色皇朝」回擊的威力。他的真正的對手鄭麗文看在眼裏,暗笑在肚裏,表面上四平八穩的說:她支持和平、公開、不耍手段的競爭:黨內以不破壞團結,為首要。 因此,鄭麗文不會譴責「境外勢力」非份的邪惡介入。境外終究是境外,無關黨內。何況要譴責的「境外勢力」更是她無所取代的盟友。他們的支持更是她成敗的關鍵。 看來,世間最難堪的事莫如郝龍彬爺,吃了黃蓮有苦卻不敢說出,如能就此了事,也就罷了!如果被形勢所逼,不得不說黃蓮不苦,傳聞失真,可以打破牙齒和血吞,多多益善!—— 那真是匪夷所思的人間悲劇吧! 趙董事長可不要令你的盟友淪落成不怎麼稱職的「悲劇演員」,逼得天下人要為其其一掬同情之淚! 作者: 徐吁

Recent Posts

從「好想贏韓國」到「被韓國比較」

從「好想贏韓國」到「被韓國比較」

過去很長一段時間,台灣人習慣把「好想贏韓國」掛在嘴邊。無論是體育競賽,還是經濟表現,只要稍有落差,總免不了一聲不甘的感嘆。韓國快速崛起為經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD)成員國,三星、現代等財閥更是叱吒全球,讓許多台灣人感覺相形見絀。然而,近年局勢悄然逆轉,當我們還來不及意識到時,韓國媒體已經開始主動把台灣視為比較對象。 [...]

More Info
趙少康是CIA 間諜 ?

趙少康是CIA 間諜 ?

泛國民黨極右派、紅統兩大言論重鎮蔡正元、邱毅,指稱前中廣董事長趙少康可能是CIA間諜。他們的邏輯運算和「連連看」的手法卻頗發人深省,有值得深究的必要! 例如,蔡先生嚴批趙董事長:「怎麼老趙也學會『抹紅』的把戲?如果依『趙氏邏輯』,中共『不制止』,就是『縱容』,中共縱容就是『介入』,那你趙少康是不是 CIA 的人?黎智英是親近CIA的人,趙少康是親近黎智英的人,所以趙少康是親近CIA [...]

More Info
當《BBC》記者去跟監英國內閣官員時…

當《BBC》記者去跟監英國內閣官員時…

想像一下,倘若新聞報導英國第三大黨的黨魁,一位將「正義」與「監督」刻在自己政治旗幟上的國會議員,被揭露長期主導一個秘密團隊,如暗影般系統性地跟蹤、偷拍執政黨或友黨的政治人物。其核心執行者竟是一位來自英國廣播公司(BBC),那個被視為英國公信力靈魂的國家媒體記者。這位記者為了任務,甚至像間諜小說的情節般,租下了大臣私人住所的停車位,以便長驅直入,進行監控。 [...]

More Info
啞吧吃黃蓮,有苦說不出!

啞吧吃黃蓮,有苦說不出!

世說:啞吧吃黃蓮,有苦說不出!你我大概只要用點想像力,就可以了解其中的尷尬情境。 但是如果當事人,不是啞吧,居然也吃了黃蓮,他說的出口,又會是怎麼樣情況?會不會哀哀呀呀,我的命好苦啊 !—— 郝龍彬爺一定可以給我們他的親身經驗。 郝爺受到「境外勢力」舖天蓋地、無所逃於天地間、冷酷、造假、毫無人性的攻擊:例如說,他親吻某名女的假影片公然在網路流竄。郝爺的情況有如承受 [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way