社會觀察 . 獨立評論 . 多元觀點 . 公共書寫 . 世代翻轉

  • Home
  • English
  • 評論
  • 民意
  • 時事
  • 生活
  • 國際
  • 歷史
  • 世代
  • 轉載
  • 投稿須知

Welcome to the New Bipolar World

  • English Article
  • 國際
  • 民意
  • 評論

Essentially, the new bipolar world has put Taiwan right in the crosshairs of the planet’s two biggest bullies, and only time will tell if it has the necessary diplomatic skill and wisdom to maintain its own peaceful existence.

Trade wars, firms getting blacklisted, oceanic border disputes, military parades, shifting alliances, sports controversies … this is the brave new global order we now live in – that of the bipolar world. 

美中兩大強權將使世界一分為二。 圖片來源:灼見名家
美中兩大強權將使世界一分為二。 圖片來源:灼見名家

What exactly is a bipolar world? Well, ‘bi’ means ‘two’, and ‘polar’ roughly means ‘opposite’, so ‘bipolar’ signifies something like ‘two opposites’. In psychology, bipolar disorder denotes a state of mind that’s also called manic depression, where the person’s mood swings from one extreme to the other. In terms of geopolitics, on the other hand, a bipolar planet is one divided in half, between the top two superpowers, with all the other countries forced to pick a side. 

Historically speaking, it seems that when one superpower arises to dominant its sphere of influence, another sometimes follows, challenging the first one for supremacy. This phenomenon originally occurred in Ancient Greece, when Athens came on the scene to take on all-powerful Sparta, a struggle that eventually led to the collapse of both city-states. This geopolitical happening even has its own term, Thucydides’s Trap, which is named after the Greek historian who pointed out that the ongoing battle between these two states, called the Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.E.), came about because of “the growth of Athenian power and the fear that this caused in Sparta”. 

Fast-forward to the 21st century, where the dominant power is the good ‘ol US of A, who – fortunately for them – won the Cold War when the Soviet Union (the last great other superpower) collapsed in 1991. Since then, the US has enjoyed a more or less unfettered reign over the Earth, pursuing its interests and implementing its policies where it saw fit, in the general absence of any comparable rival to challenge its assertions. All of that changed, however, around 2010 when China started growing at a staggering economic pace, and now – as we can see from the events mentioned in the opening sentence of this article – shit’s getting heated between these two geopolitical giants.  

Proof of how intense the struggle between the US and China has gotten in the last several years is the number of bipartisan bills the US Congress has floated on this topic. Legislative gridlock along political lines is usually the one thing you can count on in Washington, but it seems like that’s not the case for matters involving China. Recent examples of bills that would have been unthinkable a decade ago are the Defending America’s 5G Future Act (designed to keep Huawei out of the next-generation telecommunications infrastructure), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act (requiring Hong Kong’s autonomy to be certified before the city qualifies for special treatment), and the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative Act (threatening to punish countries that break their diplomatic alliances with Taiwan).    

One interesting aspect of the modern version of Thucydides’s Trap is that, while the originally cited conflict – that of Athens and Sparta – led directly to war, the struggle between the US and China seems to be playing out more in economic and ideological terms. As we can see from the Trump administration’s efforts to rectify trade imbalances with China, neutralize the power of its technology and protect American firms’ intellectual property, as well as the moral quandary many US companies face when doing business with China (ahem, the NBA), the economic conflict between the two powers is amping up like never before. But still, the struggle hasn’t degenerated into actual warfare, which is an outcome neither side probably wants (although cyberwarfare is certainly acceptable). 

So, given that the two nations creating the bipolar state of the world are the US and China, and that neither of them likely wants to engage in an open war, where does that leave Taiwan? Not in a very good place, that’s for sure, albeit a unique one. Remarkably, Taiwan is caught smack in the center of the bipolarism we’ve described – precariously straddling the chasm between both sides, if you will – because, while China claims that the island is actually part of its nation (and, in fact, the vast majority of Taiwanese people are ethnically Chinese), the US is obviously its biggest ally. And – perhaps ironically – ideologically speaking, in terms of the liberal, democratic values of its political structure, Taiwan could be said to have more in common with America than it does with the mainland. 

In practical terms, this means Taiwan has to somehow keep itself balanced between these two Goliaths, finding a way to work with and not be completely absorbed by the hostile one nearby, while currying enough favor with the one thousands of miles away to ensure its unyielding support and protection. But it’s difficult, of course, to be stuck in the middle of a bipolar universe, as that’s a space that – strictly speaking – doesn’t really exist (i.e., there can only be two sides), and if Taiwan ends up moving too far to either ‘pole’, there could be serious consequences. Essentially, the new bipolar world has put Taiwan right in the crosshairs of the planet’s two biggest bullies, and only time will tell if it has the necessary diplomatic skill and wisdom to maintain its own peaceful existence. 

Author / Peter K. Thompson

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Related

Bipolar world China USA
2019-11-17 Peter K. Thompson

Post navigation

民進黨地方立委想贏,多宣傳韓國輸 → ← 這樣的中華隊,你怎麼能不感動

Related Posts

宏都拉斯會和台灣復交嗎?

近日宏都拉斯總統大選終於在紛擾中落幕,選前被美國總統川普指名力挺的保守派候選人納斯里·阿斯夫拉(Nasry Asfura)當選總統,而包括台灣在內的國際各界都關切阿斯夫拉上台後是否會實踐他選前的承諾:跟台灣復交。   宏都拉斯現任左派總統卡斯楚於2023年和台灣斷交,轉而和中國建交之後,在這幾年來,宏都拉斯並未受到和中國建交的好處,反而先蒙受和台灣斷交後白蝦出口大幅下降(台灣是其主要出口市場)的害處,更糟糕的是卡斯楚政府高調宣稱跟中國建交能換來巨額投資、解決龐大外債、並帶來新的出口市場。然而北京並未完全滿足卡斯楚政府的期望,被批評只做「表面工夫」,使得這場總統大選中,包括阿斯夫拉在內的兩位在野黨總統候選人都痛批中國開「芭樂票」,讓執政黨總統候選人飽受抨擊,也成為這次宏都拉斯總統大選政黨輪替的關鍵因素之一。   阿斯夫拉選前曾受訪時直言:「有美國、以色列和台灣組成的三角格局,我們就能建立強大的團隊」。有台灣外交高層向媒體表示,雙方已建立溝通管道,加上美國從旁協助,對於重新恢復邦交「可以期待」。   不過,在阿斯夫拉確定當選後,中國外交部對此回應「希望在『一個中國原則』下與宏都拉斯繼續發展雙邊關係」。似乎對持觀望態度,也有期望阿斯夫拉比照薩爾瓦多總統布格磊(Nayib Bukele)在上台後放棄和台灣復交的選前主張前例。   就目前看來,阿斯夫拉上台後的對台政策可能會有三個可能方向:   一、和台灣復交,實踐他在總統大選時的承諾,即使冒著中國斷交甚至外交報復也在所不惜,但是相應的,台灣要提供大量的經濟援助。   二、維持原狀,仿效薩爾瓦多總統布格磊在上台後決定維持和中國的邦交,不再考慮和台灣復交。   三、折衷方案,在考慮中國反彈的情況下,不尋求和台灣復交,但是讓台灣比照在其他無邦交國家的作法開設駐宏都拉斯代表處,而台灣也要在非官方層面積極援助宏都拉斯。   前述方案對台灣各有利弊,尤其是第三個可能方向對於台灣國安和外交主事者是個難題,因為在沒有建立邦交的情況下,台灣在宏都拉斯開設代表處的興趣就很低,但是美國川普政府是否會「強烈希望」台灣在這個條件下積極對宏都拉斯提供經濟援助,以支持親美且為川普所喜的阿斯夫拉政府,這個情境值得台灣國安和外交主事者正視。   因此,未來台灣是否能和宏都拉斯恢復邦交,仍然有不少變數,也需要台灣、美國和宏都拉斯三方的折衝交涉,更必須對中國可能的動作做好因應,才能順利讓台灣重新以邦交國的身分重返宏都拉斯。 作者:洄瀾客  

台南市長初選政見會誰占優?

民進黨近日舉行2026年台南市長提名政見會,民進黨立委陳亭妃大打建設牌,提出「交通七彩行」、「科技三軸」等政見,希望翻轉台南溪北等地區;民進黨立委林俊憲則強化社會福利,透過補貼疫苗、營養午餐等費用,減少老人、母親、小孩族群的負擔。我認為,依台南目前的氛圍是陳亭妃占優,但林俊憲仍有翻盤機會,而兩人如何更完整將政見轉化為人民心中的願景,仍有一段路要走。 陳亭妃在政見會訴求經濟建設牌,透過手舉牌介紹市政白皮書的政見,含串聯溪北、溪南地區、發展花卉園區、台南科學園區、沙崙綠能園區以及發展鐵路地下化、環狀線等交通建設。陳亭妃希望透過公共建設來縮短舊台南縣市區的差距,這對於苦於產業空心化、人口外流的舊台南縣區民眾很有吸引力。 但是在技術面上,陳亭妃在政見會表達太多想法,導致人民無法聚焦她的市政願景,建議可將整理好的政策牛肉餵給人民,讓更多市民同感。在政見面上,許多建設仍缺乏何時完工等具體數字。另外,公共建設的成效與招商引資密切相關,建議陳亭妃未來應多強調招商能力。 林俊憲在政見會主打「照顧市民」,希望在經濟成長的同時也能促進社會分配,推出老人健保費免費、生育津貼、免費施打帶狀皰疹疫苗、國中小免費教科書與營養午餐免費等政見。林俊憲事後也在臉書指出,他希望將經濟成長轉化為福利,而提高福利是一種對未來的投資。這對於剛移入南科的新婚家庭、長者、有小孩的父母有吸引力。 但在技術面上,林俊憲在政見會最先強調「照顧長者」,其次提到家庭與小孩,可能讓人民有「社福偏重長者」的疑慮,雖然長者在選舉上是重要的票倉,且長者也需要被照顧,但作為一名市長候選人,更多強調未來願景會是更好的政見。雖然林在臉書指出,提高福利是投資未來,可惜他在政見會上較少著墨,且選民查看社群平台意願不高,恐怕讓選民有「大開社福支票」的疑慮。 在政見面上,林俊憲認為,台南科學園區的經濟成果要回饋市民,這當然是正確的想法,但南科的所得稅與營業稅大都歸中央,而房屋稅與地價稅歸台南市,其實市政府收到的錢並不算多,只能靠中央的統籌分配款回饋給地方。若依照新修財劃法可能不利於台南市,但社福支出會愈來愈大,建議林未來可強調如何兼顧招商與社福的規劃。 總體而言,陳亭妃與林俊憲在政見會展現鮮明的形象,陳亭妃定位是民進黨黨內的挑戰者,若能明確訴求如「翻轉溪北」、「拚經濟」等論述,更能讓台南選民共感,但大型建設依賴中央與地方合作,建議陳多補強與中央政府合作能力與招商相關論述。而林俊憲定位為台南市前市長賴清德路線的繼承者,經濟路線延續台南市府,並強調發展社會福利,但若林俊憲若能證明自己不只是守成者,而是「超越賴清德的市長」,更能提升選舉勝算。 作者/Oscar

Taiwan’s Legislature and Its Centrality to First Island Chain Security

In contemporary Indo-Pacific security discourse, the First Island Chain is widely recognized as a critical geostrategic barrier that shapes the balance of power between China and the United States. Within […]

鰲拜也救不了平安夜:當「洋節」撞上中共的深層恐懼!

今年的平安夜,上海街頭上演了一齣比卡夫卡小說更荒誕的現實劇。一名年輕女子身著耶誕老人裝,在寒風中分送象徵祝福的「平安果」,卻被警方以「奇裝異服」與「擾亂秩序」為由帶走盤查。當一顆蘋果成為通往派出所的門票,當商場的耶誕樹在夜色中被倉皇拆除,我們必須追問,一個自詡擁有五千年文明底蘊的強權,為何會對一個穿紅衣、發糖果的白鬍子老人感到如此徹骨的恐懼? 這場席捲中國校園與街頭的「拒過洋節」運動,絕非民眾自發的文化覺醒,而是一場由上而下、為了揣摩上意而層層加碼的政治投誠。 首先,在這場整肅中,武漢商場推出的「鰲拜版耶誕老人」顯得格外諷刺。商家將周星馳電影中的清朝權臣鰲拜,轉化為「紅帽白鬍」的中國版耶誕老人。這本應是官方最愛聽的「文化自信」範本,民眾不再盲目崇洋,而是用本土影視符號去解構並同化西方節日。然而,即便換上了「輔政大臣」的面孔,依然逃不過被封殺的命運。這揭開了一個血淋淋的真相,當局恐懼的從來不是「耶穌」,也不是「西方意識形態」,而是任何具備強大號召力、且無法被黨機器完全收編的「社會動員形式」。不管你是聖尼古拉還是鰲拜,只要你能讓人們在街頭聚集、在網路上產生共鳴,你就是潛在的維穩威脅。 這種焦慮在早前針對大學生「夜騎開封」的無情封殺中早已露餡。那群年輕人既無政治口號,也無抗議標語,僅僅是為了吃一籠湯包。但在中共的治理邏輯裡,「自發性」即是「反動性」。 任何未經審批、不受管控的集體行動,無論其目的是慶祝節日還是青春夜騎,只要展現出規模效應與組織潛力,就會觸動政權最敏感的神經。 其次,如果街頭執法是粗暴的武斷,那麼校園裡的禁令則是陰毒的恐嚇。從湖北到浙江,教育系統的觸角已伸向學生的私人通訊領域。禁止互換禮物、禁止社交軟體頭像出現耶誕元素。山東某大學甚至將「過洋節」與「入黨資格」、「評優評獎」掛鉤,這是一種極其廉價且殘酷的治理手段。 校方深知,對中國學生而言,「檔案」上的污點等同於未來生存權的毀滅。他們將充滿歡樂的節日,異化為檢測政治忠誠的「試紙」。這種建立在威脅與恐嚇之上的「文化自信」,不過是一場掩耳盜鈴的笑話。 最後,雖然中央未明文發布全國性禁令,但地方官僚為了避險、為了邀功,往往選擇「寧左勿右」的極端執行。商場耶誕樹的「拆了又裝、裝了又拆」,生動演繹了地方官員在「刺激消費」與「政治正確」之間的集體精神分裂。 他們試圖通過物理上的隔離與心理上的恐嚇,構建一道文化的防火牆。但當一個政權的控制慾發展到連一顆蘋果、一頂紅帽、甚至是一次單車出遊都容不下的地步時,反映出的恰恰是其面對自由靈魂時,那種無法掩飾的蒼白與虛弱。一個連平安夜都容不下的強權,絕不可能擁有真正的「大國自信」。 作者:秦靖  

Recent Posts

宏都拉斯會和台灣復交嗎?

宏都拉斯會和台灣復交嗎?

近日宏都拉斯總統大選終於在紛擾中落幕,選前被美國總統川普指名力挺的保守派候選人納斯里·阿斯夫拉(Nasry Asfura)當選總統,而包括台灣在內的國際各界都關切阿斯夫拉上台後是否會實踐他選前的承諾:跟台灣復交。   [...]

More Info
台南市長初選政見會誰占優?

台南市長初選政見會誰占優?

民進黨近日舉行2026年台南市長提名政見會,民進黨立委陳亭妃大打建設牌,提出「交通七彩行」、「科技三軸」等政見,希望翻轉台南溪北等地區;民進黨立委林俊憲則強化社會福利,透過補貼疫苗、營養午餐等費用,減少老人、母親、小孩族群的負擔。我認為,依台南目前的氛圍是陳亭妃占優,但林俊憲仍有翻盤機會,而兩人如何更完整將政見轉化為人民心中的願景,仍有一段路要走。 [...]

More Info
Taiwan’s Legislature and Its Centrality to First Island Chain Security

Taiwan’s Legislature and Its Centrality to First Island Chain Security

In contemporary Indo-Pacific security discourse, the First Island Chain is widely recognized as a critical geostrategic barrier that shapes the balance of power between China and the United [...]

More Info
鰲拜也救不了平安夜:當「洋節」撞上中共的深層恐懼!

鰲拜也救不了平安夜:當「洋節」撞上中共的深層恐懼!

今年的平安夜,上海街頭上演了一齣比卡夫卡小說更荒誕的現實劇。一名年輕女子身著耶誕老人裝,在寒風中分送象徵祝福的「平安果」,卻被警方以「奇裝異服」與「擾亂秩序」為由帶走盤查。當一顆蘋果成為通往派出所的門票,當商場的耶誕樹在夜色中被倉皇拆除,我們必須追問,一個自詡擁有五千年文明底蘊的強權,為何會對一個穿紅衣、發糖果的白鬍子老人感到如此徹骨的恐懼? [...]

More Info

搜尋

精選文章

川習會的中美矛盾是戰略,不是貿易!

2017-04-08 韓非

八仙樂園爆炸案:缺乏常識造成的災難

2015-06-28 異想

彰化縣民輪替後的哀與愁

2016-03-06 許家瑋

新文明病:儲物症(Hoarding disorder)似正在增加

2015-04-13 楊庸一

訂閱本站

輸入你的電子郵件訂閱新文章並接收新通知。

Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way
Powered by WordPress | theme Dream Way